Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.138]) by air-mb01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB014-a1884d3c16621d6; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:02 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B6962380000B6; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PgyTO-0006e8-T6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:51:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PgyTO-0006dz-EP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:51:10 +0000 Received: from mail-gw0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PgyTM-0002Vj-JL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:51:10 +0000 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so973876gwb.16 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:51:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=anesodLpGf/btjzU5xe7kWk8wxw5mttao+VzqXFdHWQ=; b=nhgblXo32/JMBgs9FCyj91QNn8jaRvZ6cfWBQn8d826nfouw99Im2XWKE4MTjy+BYl hoQo30brHr1teJq8WYeAMzeYVjbnbD+KwyjVjLPYNQ4cCdxK8MpyS5Z17+sYl3OKwKu7 taIzzG0fvNM7kdcvvNt0oRCQq7aQuPaxSmri8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BH0ry050kzJ4DO+idifb/X/Pu8ESzHzasvLlt7v2tW9Ch5+Y9YiNAl7pStzKqDHg/Y tgVP6TMeY+QQ8IkYunyoyGhJmvZOaMqAUD47ZxG2I5yCsstJyTmBt/EQ3Cpc6jHz+77L uDp79zY4HyVeYatXVqrHyHdAtZrAFUaV+4TDY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.107.13 with SMTP id f13mr1986291anc.159.1295783461973; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:51:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.228.18 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:51:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41E6D616029D49FDA12AD9982B8A5BD9@White> References: <4CA5E86D.1070208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <6F6098420211436FABB78BE04E5F8FAD@JimPC> <000901cb6215$2db60550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4CA7096F.7070307@freenet.de> <25B77CFFDA13430086BE150894C4D3C3@Black> <5C71BB4133A642F7A2D06B26B567880D@Black> <65DFBC8F38CD4AF48A62C61B6BC4DCC4@Black> <4CF78D62.9070403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4CF923F3.5070407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <931923.22241.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <265816.87720.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <41E6D616029D49FDA12AD9982B8A5BD9@White> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:51:01 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IY6CmQ5izu5TL3jSiq-9mxG9Q6w Message-ID: From: Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d322f4edcf049a821829 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d309.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408a4d3c166059fe X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e642d322f4edcf049a821829 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Marcus & group, I decided to keep out of the way until I know that I am radiating a clean signal or any signal at all for that matter. I have a problem at the moment which I need to resolve. 73 Gary - G4WGT. On 23 January 2011 10:43, Markus Vester wrote: > Gary, if you'd place your carrier within +-70 mHz of 8970.0, you might > have a chance to appear on Stefan's 0.42 mHz "6000" grabber. > > Good luck, > Markus > > *From:* Gary - G4WGT > *Sent:* Sunday, January 23, 2011 11:36 AM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz > > Hi Daniele, LF, > > I am planning to carry out tests on 8.968kHz from about 1200utc. Starting > with continuous carrier for 1 hour or longer & then a short message at > QRSS600 which will be repeated if time allows. > > Any reports or comments will be welcome. > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo. > > > > On 23 January 2011 08:54, Daniele Tincani wrote: > >> Hello VLF, >> any transmission tests planned today? >> Regards >> D. >> >> >> > --0016e642d322f4edcf049a821829 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Marcus & group,

I decided to keep out of the way= until I know that I am radiating a clean signal or any signal at all for= that matter.

I have a problem at the moment whic= h I need to resolve.

73

Gary - G4WGT.

On 23 January 2011 10:43, Markus Vester= <markusveste= r@aol.com> wrote:
Gary, if you'd place your carrier= within +-70 mHz=20 of 8970.0, you might have a chance to appear on Stefan's=A00.42 mHz &q= uot;6000"=20 grabber.
=A0
Good luck,
Markus

Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Transmissions on 8970Hz

Hi Daniele, LF,=20

I am planning to carry out tests on 8.968kHz from about 1200utc. Star= ting=20 with continuous carrier for 1 hour or longer & then a short message at= =20 QRSS600 which will be repeated if time allows.

Any reports or comments will be welcome.

73

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qo.



On 23 January 2011 08:54, Daniele Tincani <danieletincani@yahoo.com>=20 wrote:
Hello VLF,
any transmission tests planned today?
Regards
D.
=A0


<= /div>

--0016e642d322f4edcf049a821829--