Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.223]) by air-me03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME033-8baa4d3369b437a; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:57:08 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 12FC238000103; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:57:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Peaa6-0003lo-Sd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:56:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Peaa6-0003lf-9L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:56:14 +0000 Received: from mail-yw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Peaa4-0005XA-F4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:56:14 +0000 Received: by yws5 with SMTP id 5so1454256yws.16 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:56:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BbuN5SqoPW/lGuQV5tlxjYBRvjV3hEc0g+Q2VAvRP8E=; b=tkgiI8T5ZjcF77H/PAT7pr+mOcmAW4aRVVYGRuwjt4vdn8pHP9nnSiFWeGK/DMMgrR PGjpWJkvgwmaCqDQkXv5LEUpvqkZw/tZ8pTJnRPtj7ZClEfEOamv3SkrHoZlUZumVQUL wHGqC5JngZhnzYi+A4nLK5rU8SYghAE02Hlpg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FAb2bfkrf7+/Ek7dJ9bHEzzT8zzo7F9cHR4wKMWtDLUkbhD5QzgQ8LVqVPh9+zrSc3 Pt8Ngx/wW4Kvm3Tku0iANghkXSez8HWiIt0bZZJOQsAZ47cVtcJl+DH6yg9vWupzMXLV tE2Lf+U/P/Yy4sNKaaMeKyR76YQIu4ZwtFcCA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.228.12 with SMTP id a12mr2095948anh.57.1295214966260; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:56:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.228.18 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:56:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:56:06 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UHQ0qU5RJQTd08-cBKSFFZhWq7k Message-ID: From: Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636af0237f8c4270499fdbbda X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m218.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60df4d3369b24315 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --001636af0237f8c4270499fdbbda Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Graham, OK, you do get a strong 504kHz carrier, not good for top of band Rxing. I got no replies. I am WSPRing Tx/Rx on 160 until about midnight & WSPR Rx on 136kHz. X2 ROS may need a powerful PC but I will keep trying. Cheers Gary - G4WGT. On 16 January 2011 21:40, Graham wrote: > G. > > 3578 .. was a good frequency for MF-1 / 7 Reply , just on the edge= of > the psk band , giving carrier 3579.5 > > X 2 ros will not work on most pc 's with the new level of codi= ng > , that was the problem with the first qso with Iceland , running = on P4 > 4Ghz ! > > > ft897 >> RX1: > 20:15 @ 7.5 Hz: 6Q CQ DE G4WGT IN IO83QO 502KHZ OR 3590KHZ X-BG^D ROS4= PSE > HT] -34 dB 33 km @ 056=BA .........but very big 504 carrier > showing over S9 ..has de sensed the rx ! > > G. > > *From:* Gary - G4WGT > *Sent:* Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:20 PM > *To:* LF Group (RSGB) > *Subject:* LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz > > LF, > > I am calling CW for QSO 502kHz or X-Band 3602kHz, please use ROS4 on 80m= . > > Gary - G4WGT. > > > > --001636af0237f8c4270499fdbbda Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Graham,

OK, you do get a strong 504kHz carrier, not goo= d for top of band Rxing.=A0I got no replies.

I am= WSPRing Tx/Rx on 160 until about midnight & WSPR Rx on 136kHz.
<= div>
X2 ROS may need a powerful PC but I will keep trying.
=

Cheers

Gary - G4WGT.



On 16 Janua= ry 2011 21:40, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
G.
=A0
=A03578 .. was a=A0 good frequency=A0= =20 for=A0 MF-1 / 7 Reply=A0 , just on the=A0 edge of the=A0 psk=A0=20 band , giving=A0 carrier=A0 3579.5
=A0
X 2=A0 ros=A0 will=A0 not=A0 work on= =20 most pc 's=A0=A0 with the=A0 new=A0 level=A0 of=A0 coding ,=20 that=A0 was the=A0 problem with the=A0 first qso=A0 with=A0=20 Iceland , running=A0 on P4 4Ghz !
=A0

ft897 >>=A0 RX1:

20:15 @ 7.5= Hz:=20 6Q CQ DE=20 G4WGT=20 IN IO83QO=20 502KHZ OR 3590KHZ X-BG^D ROS4 PSE HT] <CANCEL>=20 -34 dB 33 km @ 056=BA=A0 .........but very=A0 big=A0 504=A0=20 carrier=A0 showing over S9 ..has de sensed the=A0 rx !
=A0
G.

Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:20 PM
Subject: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz

LF,=20

I am calling CW for QSO 502kHz or X-Band 3602kHz, please use ROS4 on= =20 80m.

Gary - G4WGT.




--001636af0237f8c4270499fdbbda--