Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mj07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mj07.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.91]) by air-ma01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA014-b4f24d3567913af; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:12:33 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 60BF13800008B; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:12:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pf8Wo-00005R-Gf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:11:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pf8Wn-00005I-Vd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:11:05 +0000 Received: from mail-gy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf8Wk-0001Xk-Cw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:11:05 +0000 Received: by gyg13 with SMTP id 13so2195809gyg.16 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:10:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B00KB7X8MxW6T/GjoAMyEFTGKix4dr2ARAKt9JwHtLM=; b=m8L6Np0jMmQ48gKjgxXfyv/CE11pHuiN//l0q+5PBe5UZNVdFIAaJ0Bc777Eq2Ab+2 KMDdmzD61AnHSEnhtB3zfISGbziDWCXH94WFelxvZpn+lKe+osc23sHosHqhMc1Yin48 fMSczhTAXDv1CJMsSWrFcYhpZYINiowrkTP90= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MJFHHLALzQNEmWPIQjDweDdXiq7UL9vCyZ8v5AMA/EmlqkGNGd1ckRTpIdx490VW4P S0Xqan6LJJYbttGD+89SVRu1nU46w3hZQaAQHFvKqlLyDoZrWP2AOcLDlL1xoJJOelLq cwTAilAAXcOZ+PcOLrtBEvtmPTrx5oiVvcwtk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.123.9 with SMTP id v9mr2039194anc.125.1295345455945; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.228.18 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:10:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D349C2F.2030409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <82944.27577.qm@web111915.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:10:55 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bTrHL_3q2-CDb6msN7OMtyZ3Quk Message-ID: From: Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6408b08c35a37049a1c1d9f X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d016.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039400c89ae4d35679029ed X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e6408b08c35a37049a1c1d9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Last night I changed my SpecLab configuration to a version of narrow 1mHz.= I had a couple of traces on the screen when I checked this morning. Comparin= g with the other grabbers they don't seem to match a time-scale for visible traces there but are very close to the announced frequencies of the Austri= an operators. Would you please look at my 9kHz grabber & tell me if they are genuine traces from a known 8.970kHz test or otherwise. I note that the traces appear at the same time as an increase in noise &= a peak in the Alpha signal. I will appreciate any comment please. Please look at my grabber :- http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15990181/9khz.jpg 73 Gary - G4WGT. On 17 January 2011 20:33, Markus Vester wrote: > Daniele: Ossi is still transmitting, so you could try now! > > 73, Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* Daniele Tincani > *Sent:* Monday, January 17, 2011 9:16 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th > > Hi, > any chance from here (JN53EM) in your opinion? May be I could have a try= on > next transmission (possibly during w.e.). > Regards > D. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Stefan Sch=E4fer > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Mon, January 17, 2011 8:44:47 PM > *Subject:* Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th > > Jacek, Ossi, VLF, > > Congratulations! 699km in 3.8 mHz (suitable for DFCW-600) is surely a ne= w > record for a fixed installed antenna on VLF by amateurs! Maybe 4X1RF cou= ld > try to receive in "6000" as well?:-) > > 73, Stefan > > Am 17.01.2011 19:02, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: > > There is a good signal on 8970Hz indeed! > > > > I can see it in both 3.8mHz bandwidth, and in 179uHz bandwidth. In > 179uHz bandwidth the signal has abt. 12dB S/N! This signal has a nice st= able > frequency. > > > > The QTH is Warsaw, Poland loc. KO02md. > > > > The station is Ossi OE5ODL. The Distance from SQ5BPF to OE5ODL (JN68RD= ) > is 699km! > > > > Nice to see another station transmit on VLF. Congratulations! > > > > VY 73 > > > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > > --0016e6408b08c35a37049a1c1d9f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,

Last night I changed my SpecLab configuration= to a version of narrow 1mHz. I had a couple of traces on the screen when= I checked this morning. Comparing with the other grabbers they don't= seem to match a time-scale for visible traces there but are very close to= the announced frequencies of the Austrian operators.

Would you please look at my 9kHz grabber &= tell me if they are genuine traces from a known 8.970kHz test or otherwis= e.

I note that the traces appear at the same time= as an increase in noise & a peak in the Alpha signal.

I will appreciate any comment please. Please look at= my grabber :-


73

Gary - G4WGT.

On 17 January 2011 20:33, Markus Ve= ster <markusv= ester@aol.com> wrote:
Daniele: Ossi is still transmitting,= so you could=20 try now!
=A0
73, Markus (DF6NM)=20

Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th

Hi,
any chance from here (JN53EM) in your opinion? May be I could have a= try on=20 next transmission (possibly during w.e.).
Regards
D.
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <= schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Mon, January 17, 2011= 8:44:47=20 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: 897= 0.02 Hz=20 + 10th

Jacek, Ossi, VLF,

Congratulations! 699km in 3.= 8 mHz=20 (suitable for DFCW-600) is surely a new record for a fixed installed anten= na on=20 VLF by amateurs! Maybe 4X1RF could try to receive in "6000" as= =20 well?:-)

73, Stefan

Am 17.01.2011 19:02, schrieb Jacek=20 Lipkowski:
> There is a good signal on 8970Hz indeed!
>
&g= t; I=20 can see it in both 3.8mHz bandwidth, and in 179uHz bandwidth. In=A0 179uHz= =20 bandwidth the signal has abt. 12dB S/N! This signal has a nice stable=20 frequency.
>
> The QTH is Warsaw, Poland loc. KO02md.
>= =20
> The station is Ossi OE5ODL. The Distance from SQ5BPF to OE5ODL (J= N68RD)=20 is 699km!
>
> Nice to see another station transmit on VLF.=20 Congratulations!
>
> VY 73
>
> Jacek /=20 SQ5BPF



--0016e6408b08c35a37049a1c1d9f--