Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.74.211]) by air-da03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA034-86634d321a8176; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:06:57 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B4464380000A5; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:06:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PeEGB-0004vE-0L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:06:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PeEGA-0004v5-KK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:06:10 +0000 Received: from mail-pw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PeEG7-0000Da-TJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:06:10 +0000 Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so602799pwj.16 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:06:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4qU2pmPwSRR1zcP4PqnI6W45v1XaSapUybHBJ7xD1U4=; b=aG21MTHJtJ70t1xGxDd7v087hzSXp2fYjPX9+qs/y0ePYKxjBB6toV+ow+3F8RSSKb JEp0uq+V1KJ0OT0nsXHZDJ0PXr996Pz9KeJCBxjqf0HSxK6pE+/Nqh5Zdu7FDWN8doD+ i0IhzXzPjf692EyYblLdN/CVkiQAb3wlGhAdw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=prTY2yvPmkb0A+WV2LktQdt1UIkTGipCB9TnvYL0wz5iSekK+2V9WTUyOURI1xKKSd sO0izCD8Ky5yo6lbx0a2P2awIQfwPTxxslbTNfyY7o0ljU1lIcbgI1Cud/uPAEsygKNW 8fDoX/bOXgKEkW7XAJDE+ccdMbvwcgC/w9JKU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.222.4 with SMTP id u4mr1994566wfg.445.1295129160973; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.11.11 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:06:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:06:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anton_B=E4rtschi?= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_00_10=0.642,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Separate Receiving Antenna? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd149ba93fc920499e9c192 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m231.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad34d321a7f50d1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --000e0cd149ba93fc920499e9c192 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Soon I may use a freestanding and isolated 125m mast with an excellent radial network for LF. Should I use a separate receiving antenna or try to receive also with the mast? 73 de Toni --000e0cd149ba93fc920499e9c192 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Soon I may use a freestanding and isolated 125m mast with an excellent radial network for LF. Should I use a separate receiving antenna or try to receive also with the mast?
73 de Toni
--000e0cd149ba93fc920499e9c192--