Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.140]) by air-ma10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA102-b5414d34a3fe3cd; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:18:06 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EB61A38000098; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:18:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PevVT-0000mV-9U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:16:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PevVP-0000mM-52 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:16:47 +0000 Received: from nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.84]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PevVN-0005mQ-I2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:16:47 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.64] by nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2011 20:16:37 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.21] by tm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2011 20:16:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2011 20:16:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 511333.35587.bm@omp1021.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 28376 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Jan 2011 20:16:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295295397; bh=BDd6lZTos0+ER0pQ6HY1D72Krk0+dsPlOdIniggBhJs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P2u9lIxvjxZ8Aj7ExU1kNDmYfAaROlCF3rb+lfTJf/NL9KhJgmTgkY8wJb6RLVXMJuhOi1KQX30ISeG4VQ+QzgWzvUNH5oCJA0tUqrngPc4wEVXbdhXYmxlLqdIeawBfgHH0m3mvxhrY20t5zYetQWZWk7uh97s4EdBsbTZIsqs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3bwZG7Fm0pzrPMxG4M1NPSB127dnePZMuOqXgsmrcN1C/EIBpLFZSU504NJ+f5Oyz0LklOZnyfCMJmu78SViGAAIova58lktQ1TCycxf47oZcPlp23NCOc/vu3eHQ9P9BhtkGBwOea2z6G/EJnKzjtHbQ7HcPdHzizeC7wmUvRU=; Message-ID: <82944.27577.qm@web111915.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: K3yGRL8VM1lQx9WAUADuD.Q5_xj.kCjrQy_9m3oi.CaxUzO SCWjP1wr8z0F2zf.ftdWcrsZi2p3iyCuaXwdpmVfKOi_ryf4fjUa0Clo9FCM X3v1D0X30DpIppi7.pMdsR8H63zgdSGoFnfaBB80nDvkI7F4KCDfrfhuLlBr NB5.JrvyTOjtIPWQ4pcJDx7lWpP4NPU4T6BLZeXPDe9X6rvD8iNHeuRA3ZKt IKBlghFpfIorFRoh6zrStOb_sgx0chbRO_AGLRcCv8Bb1Um.jh.TOpn.7XS3 eCmPOHG_fzMWCUf.FU7rTwoGUNhdgwdwSa5mn.fR_BxYRvRLv7w-- Received: from [87.6.172.215] by web111915.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:16:37 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/555 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <4D349C2F.2030409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0800 (PST) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4D349C2F.2030409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-312817994-1295295397=:27577" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m023.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408c4d34a3fc1527 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 --0-312817994-1295295397=:27577 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, any chance from here (JN53EM) in your opinion? May be I could have a try= on next=20 transmission (possibly during w.e.). Regards D. ________________________________ From: Stefan Sch=E4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Mon, January 17, 2011 8:44:47 PM Subject: Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th Jacek, Ossi, VLF, Congratulations! 699km in 3.8 mHz (suitable for DFCW-600) is surely a new= record=20 for a fixed installed antenna on VLF by amateurs! Maybe 4X1RF could try to= =20 receive in "6000" as well?:-) 73, Stefan Am 17.01.2011 19:02, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: > There is a good signal on 8970Hz indeed! >=20 > I can see it in both 3.8mHz bandwidth, and in 179uHz bandwidth. In=A0 17= 9uHz=20 >bandwidth the signal has abt. 12dB S/N! This signal has a nice stable fre= quency. >=20 > The QTH is Warsaw, Poland loc. KO02md. >=20 > The station is Ossi OE5ODL. The Distance from SQ5BPF to OE5ODL (JN68RD)= is=20 >699km! >=20 > Nice to see another station transmit on VLF. Congratulations! >=20 > VY 73 >=20 > Jacek / SQ5BPF =20 --0-312817994-1295295397=:27577 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
any chance from here (JN53EM) in your opinion? May be I could have a= try on next transmission (possibly during w.e.).
Regards
D.
=
=
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <= ;schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Mon, January 17, 2011 8:44:47 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10t= h

Jacek, Ossi, VLF,

Congratulations! 699km in 3.8 mHz= (suitable for DFCW-600) is surely a new record for a fixed installed ante= nna on VLF by amateurs! Maybe 4X1RF could try to receive in "6000" as well= ?:-)

73, Stefan

Am 17.01.2011 19:02, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski= :
> There is a good signal on 8970Hz indeed!
>
> I can= see it in both 3.8mHz bandwidth, and in 179uHz bandwidth. In  179uHz= bandwidth the signal has abt. 12dB S/N! This signal has a nice stable fre= quency.
>
> The QTH is Warsaw, Poland loc. KO02md.
> > The station is Ossi OE5ODL. The Distance from SQ5BPF to OE5ODL (JN68RD) is 69= 9km!
>
> Nice to see another station transmit on VLF. Congrat= ulations!
>
> VY 73
>
> Jacek / SQ5BPF


--0-312817994-1295295397=:27577--