Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.74.211]) by air-me05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME051-8bb04d25d528308; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:43:52 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A2727380000B4; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:43:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Par2z-0007qu-CB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:42:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Par2y-0007ql-NR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:42:36 +0000 Received: from nm1.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.218]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Par2x-0004Rg-Rj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:42:36 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.182] by nm1.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 14:42:28 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.178] by tm13.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 14:42:28 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 14:42:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 890018.95359.bm@omp1019.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 16359 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 14:42:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=JnzWnrHxj1vIL2gfZfu7CL6juI0ilyBsM17OwgF7f5qfDaO5r7fKJOL2CcOOuAKmNJPzlwwFTb4EkHUY4QX2U8g5oZfSzzbLS0qo4XciXkU8jIrLa4UHfYqftLvhuSuth9/lVTHSQ5pF2oFtHJxHBsn4rj9VvxNVTtRjAfeTK1E= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1294324948; bh=k8F6j3JsJR5LU6xsmiJ72RWB2tsHtsaM8SRKxIYFJNg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=VR+cH2q8NWXkMOekE9g/asMIrnYaaV38X8yJTACvX6KrXTUcMPCb8RNDyhGqEChwjAiiGXIbjRA6EPeenDtA3+73gxgxhRdcPm2TlknyC87Rr0nND0SGsJARQvnt9P6UhgSyNHCA7wZuCv9+v/Om8Ba5Rf+8zSuDTI7pukJfR7k= Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@109.156.208.18 with login) by smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jan 2011 14:42:25 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- X-YMail-OSG: qdwk8UIVM1kZF1gaSnNoscLsLLMCq2GVuK8vZVucfgRdHBR wuRsPsgz.WW.iwpsw.VVVF2G2Yh7i7tBUAaEB9.XSPtXu7dvO4lj63iOL93M GwgY36MJEf_Q44FhFCaLMwverSNmjXthc7A83rJEWglnUBIj4L1KnabykOHj PDsDjAJdP5Sug0t_a6RYOhIPwbBTlspF0o_vrUdwZU0.XTZ3WVdNo4TcpkpP bgKmB26_wBxPmIyl6mOp6i8.4s3GUqxnPmAythmAryBvdN.Z5sK6PJnT9LQ3 bUfLMuEHicAdbB0WlL_w.QK1zcY_r_h959cDY22P6ku3v X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <5961FA4401BA460E89A59A764DF00469@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <3F10330D89BC46B2B0071A38A6E5EC09@PCFausto> In-Reply-To: <3F10330D89BC46B2B0071A38A6E5EC09@PCFausto> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:42:25 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Vertical antenna and connection line Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m210.1 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad34d25d5264003 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 Dear Fausto, LF Group, Beware of sweeping generalisations - I think the answer is that "it depends on the antenna". You need to think about your particular antenna carefully. At 136k, 20m of transmission line feeding a high impedance load (such as an electrically short vertical antenna) will behave essentially as a shunt capacitor. The capacitance of a high Zo open wire line is of the order of several pF per metre, which may be increased by being close to the ground. So your feeder would have capacitance of a few 100s of pF. This will be in parallel with the antenna impedance, which will be equivalent to a capacitor in series with a resistor. If the antenna capacitance is large compared to the feeder capacitance, the feeder will make little difference, while if the antenna capacitance is small compared to the feeder, the feeder current at the TX end will be much higher than the antenna current, leading to increased losses in the antenna tuner and feeder. So for small antennas, having the tuner close to the antenna is very desireable. So what is the capacitance of the antenna? According to your info on QRZ.com, the mast is 25m high, and you will be using it to suspend an inverted L for 137k - unless you have another 25m mast, I guess the inverted L top loading wire will actually be sloping... Your QTH seems to have plenty of space, so I guess it would be no problem to have at least 100m of wire in the top load. As a rough estimate, an isolated wire has about 6pF/m, so with a downlead, the capacitance might be 700pF. This would be about right for the variometer in the picture. So this would be substantially more than the capacitance of the feeder, which is good. But as Stefan and Rik say, another problem wil be the high voltage on the feeder. The voltage depends on the required antenna current. At your good QTH, with a sloping wire 25m high at one end, it should not be difficult to get an effective height >10m. This would have radiation resistance of about 30milliohms, and to achieve 1W ERP, an antenna current less than 4A would be needed. The reactance of 700pF at 137k is about 1700ohms, so 4A would result in a voltage of about 6.6kV. This is quite high, but should not be a problem for the antenna - many amateurs have managed to operate LF antennas at 20kV or so with reasonable reliability. However, it would require wide spacing, and careful design of insulators, for the transmission line. But why do you need the ladder line? If you want to have the tuner in the shack, from your photograph it looks like you could simply run a downlead from the top of the mast directly to the shack... This would have the minimum of loss and insulation problems. Hope this is helpful, Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fausto Coletti" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 11:28 AM Subject: LF: Vertical antenna and connection line Hello, A question for RF expert: you think that i can connect a Marconi antenna and relative gound system to the variometer with a high impedance ladder line?