Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.207]) by air-ma07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA072-b52d4d263587264; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:35:03 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AD923380000B8; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 16:35:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PaxSk-0005mF-Rf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:33:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PaxSk-0005m6-2U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:33:38 +0000 Received: from nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PaxSj-0007dZ-Gh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:33:38 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.214] by nm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 21:33:31 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.164] by tm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 21:33:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 21:33:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 785641.45269.bm@omp1005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 28303 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 21:33:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=4QWjvoC39wIGdoPHRmV9dk0iDZp2x2ZQlIkrwoAF6Dw/DS/GZKjBukt1HMtW3iPsbwQJ8RM1DP3H4Wj0VKL71Ka61F1qPK/prFVZ7CgmCN+yhpeb1PYHVaWNQN83h5wIzSPaDcFJ7adBfQSH3kREEKZ0V0H88vckv0fc+LrsfgM= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1294349611; bh=AQ+jeT7sBW/6WP77VIskdAPUTw6DlKXxS98z24P2ubA=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=R/REKUgTCDAvbzp9u0Rxx24becERB4RsoInWIPnJ09L3HAUl7YGCFnGUNTCehAyPx9ZY+KTc50iYN8sLHAWBYH4GpMhSVeyWGpRf8A5xTKwv5npcam1rOXMuDLD8pzOA491/uhw15gsI2PAafnb6WW4n1euKgfbPsEmX4BBYk6E= Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@109.156.208.18 with login) by smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jan 2011 21:33:28 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- X-YMail-OSG: qM8z4q4VM1k8zYcRJT9PCbZ7Fe5gLtBZbX.Bnekvf.GMSbo .5h74dy4kJtmrSe0C4wiWQeQ.yV2Y7k7NAVDkYXWdNrD3_jmDp9dWTxzf4Kg mascA28aN1eAlh95Za4Wi2q3j8OKdYbQiCEXMIRY.F5Te5f5cd1GWzGCgi47 O3IEckeDohDm8jeO59uAASzCzwZY8KjR1p0UlquT1v_AXKkcODr0TOZ.pQUo QuDjdmxrPfd20Rz0j8Nlh1SUPu8I9lJsfOO2zGb4tBIvXyZyEDdhCy_896rq DGNlcoQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <55F29B964A0142EE93CCD0BCFD084EDF@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <4D25EC9A.6030201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4D25EC9A.6030201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:33:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: adding a L into a 300m LF vertical? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m007.1 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cf4d263585453f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 Dear Stefan, LF Group, > _Questions:_ Is my calculation reasonably useful? Would YOU add that > coil in a height of 100m above GND? I have found with NEC simulations that they give you a reasonable idea of the impedance, but not a precise value. Especially for the resistance, where there are many unknowns - NEC really only sets a lower limit. On the basis of the calculations, I would first try without the coil, then if results are as expected, I would try it with the coil. Otherwise there are too many variables to make sense of the experiment - if the coil goes up and the impedance is totally different from the calculation, is it because of the coil, the antenna, or the calculation? > > I tend to let it be since the improvement isn't that much and the effort > is high. Furthermore the coil losses could be higher since i have to use > a thin wire to keep the weight small... Yes - the 136k coils I have made with Q > 300 have been rather big, either with RF Litz wire or thick solid wire. Hope to see some signals at the weekend, Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU