Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi05.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.163]) by air-de04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE044-5eb14d22e83a66; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 04:28:26 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7675B380000BB; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 04:28:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pa3Ap-0003VL-IX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:27:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pa3Ao-0003VC-UJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:27:22 +0000 Received: from filter02.i-online.fr ([195.200.78.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa3An-0002fY-6q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:27:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com ([195.200.78.13]) by filter02.i-online.fr (IceWarp 10.0.7 (2010-02-10)) with ESMTP (SSL) id NKD33915 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:25:15 +0100 Received: (qmail 20928 invoked by uid 507); 4 Jan 2011 10:25:31 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.103?) (john.rabson@numeo.fr@217.67.155.178) by smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2011 10:25:31 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: John Rabson In-Reply-To: <4D1CA675.5070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:25:34 +0100 Message-Id: <4D6379EA-53C8-4E84-9547-83385565A8AE@numeo.fr> References: <5010F8F002AC4F598A01115AA882C5CD@White> <4D17D186.9010504@gmail.com> <002401cba55d$47d7fcf0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <1EDC8A62B7414B45AA7725E81BB5111F@White> <4D191F8C.8060209@toya.net.pl> <4D1927DC.4080103@toya.net.pl> <4D1929D0.1050308@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4D1BC000.5070507@toya.net.pl> <4D1C620E.6050404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4D1C66F0.20102@freenet.de> <4D1CA675.5070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: LF: LF "Mobile" ( was : "NM" on 136177 ) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=CELL_PHONE_BOOST autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400cdecd4d22e8391b25 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 Hello Stefan, Wolf , LF, I have a diesel Renault Kangaroo [no - KANGOO - obviously an Australian= designed this dictation software]. I have found it impossible to make we= ak-signal field strength measurements on 136 from the vehicle.=20 There appears to be some kind of data bus to communicate between a central= control unit and sensors which indicate (for example) whether the doors= are open or closed. Something seems to be running even when the engine= is switched off. My solution is going to be a portable receiver and anten= na which can be carried a few metres away from the car, otherwise I cannot= measure field strengths with any usefulness at a distance of more than ab= out 2 km from the transmitter. There is even a problem on some longwave broadcast stations. 73 John F5VLF On 30 Dec 2010, at 16:34CET, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Hello Wolf, >=20 > Nice email ;-) > Well, no it is a benzine car, an almost 22 years old VW Golf II !! ;-)= You could know it from the VLF pictures, HI :-) So there is no internal= electric bus! And i have a car radio (ALDI!) that receives on VHF/MF/LF= and i do not have QRM by the ignition coil! Once i made holidays at the= Nordsee (JO33) i drove with the car and listened to DLF/153 kHz during th= e whole tour without problems. Only HV transmission lines above 110 kV cau= se QRM. >=20 > So maybe i have a little better situation to receive DF6NM on LF /m. Oth= erwise i have to drive on the highway, lets say 180 km/h (the maximum of= this car) and have to switch off the engine during Markus' transmission= that must be short then until i have to accelerate again at 90 km/h :-)).= If this will not work i have to drive to a highway near N=FCrnberg :-) >=20 > The magnet foot antenna is already ordered and i am curious about the re= sults ;-) Mostly i need it for receiving LF during the VLF experiments, e.= g. to the xband QSO 9/137 with DF6NM, and maybe DF0WD? :-) >=20 > 73, Stefan >=20 > Am 30.12.2010 12:03, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: >> Hi Stefan, >>=20 >>=20 >> you wrote: >> > This should allow me to easily receive 137 kHz while driving the car! >> > Hopefully there is not to much QRM during engine is running. >> > So maybe i can try a crossband QSO with DF6NM TXing on 137 and me ans= wering on 30m while beeing on the highway :-) >>=20 >>=20 >> Maybe, it's a Diesel engine, and the alternator properly low-pass filte= red. I tried this years ago, and the QRM from the ignition coil, and / or= the alternator was horrible. No big surprise that car radios with AM LF= broadcast receivers have disappeared. And weak-signal reception "LF mobil= e" is even more a challenge. >>=20 >> In my Corolla, I would even have to disconnect the battery (!) if I was= to receive VLF (and, most likely, LF too) because some internal digital= bus (most likely CAN or LIN) remains active, with the ignition and everyt= hing else turned off. For temporary V(!)LF operation on a remote site, I= use a simple FM oscillator at the transmitter now, and listen to the VLF= signals in the car's radio, using a distance of 10 m or so. >>=20 >>=20 >> Cheers and a happy new year, >> Wolf DL4YHF . >>=20 >=20 >=20