Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.130]) by air-db03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB033-86454d34525d392; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:29:49 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6E3A5380000B4; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:29:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Peq4o-0003cN-3N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:28:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Peq4n-0003cE-L0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:28:57 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Peq4l-0002X6-R2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:28:57 +0000 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p0HESs1b012074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:28:55 +0100 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0HESrEs032005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:28:54 +0100 Received: from [147.142.9.131] (vpn509-131.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.9.131]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0HESn7A023912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:28:51 +0100 Message-ID: <4D345222.5010505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:28:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <532F7D4648B74CCF825F0D0E596655AF@home2361108df7> <006901cbb595$e50b51f0$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.192,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080608060704010908060100" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40824d34525c5ace X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------080608060704010908060100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roger, Am 16.01.2011 17:24, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: > I'll make an order for a bunch of the recommended caps tonight and > some thicker wire for the loop. Well, maybe its better to use several thin (enamelled) wires in parallel, say 10x 0.5mm diameter instead of 1x 1.5mm. 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------080608060704010908060100 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roger,

Am 16.01.2011 17:24, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
I'll make an order for a bunch of the recommended caps tonight and some thicker wire for the loop.

Well, maybe its better to use several thin (enamelled) wires in parallel, say 10x 0.5mm diameter instead of 1x 1.5mm.

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------080608060704010908060100--