Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.202]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB044-86984d2dd458e4; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:18:32 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3259D38000120; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:18:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pd3OA-000089-Ip for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:17:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pd3OA-000080-68 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:17:34 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd3O8-0000Ep-V3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:17:34 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0CGHVLb008552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:17:31 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p0CGHVoW019309 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:17:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4D2DD34A.1040908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:14:02 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1294848122.2424.40.camel@gerhard-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1294848122.2424.40.camel@gerhard-desktop> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Additon to "Noisy" antenna on VLF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca4d2dd456634f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Gerhard, VLF, Are you transmitting at 8969.98 Hz? There is a strong signal on your grabber and on mine as well! http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html The signal is O copy, even stronger than Ossis signal. How can this be possible? Do you use a balloon? Nice surprise! This cannot only be due to the current increase but must be a propagation issue as well (if its not a balloon)! Distance between us is 588 km. This would be the strongest and farest VLF signal i have seen so far! Tell us more! 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Ossis signal is visible at 8970.03 Hz Am 12.01.2011 17:02, schrieb Gerhard Hickl: > Dear group! > > In my previous post I told you that the noise is now even louder than 2 > weeks ago because the antenna-current increased from 400 to more than > 500mA. > > The more I wonder why my two cats are still not reacting in any way. It > is said that cats can hear up to 100kHz and their ears are at least > twice as sensitive compared to humans. > > Event to me the singing sound is nearly a bother in some places. > > I'm aware that this is a "off topic" but still interesting. > > Though I know how my cats would react to dogs, it would be interesting > how dogs would react to the "noise".... > > 73 > > OE3GHB > Gerhard > > >