Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.5]) by air-dd06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD062-86344d26feec5a; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 06:54:20 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6B3BB380000BA; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 06:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PbAso-0004Wg-95 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:53:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PbAsn-0004WX-T8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:53:25 +0000 Received: from lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.148]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PbAsl-00046h-A1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:53:25 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1PbAsk-0005G8-Xk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:53:22 +0000 Received: from opc2.twatt.home (opc2.twatt.home [192.168.21.202]) by svr3.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102431BE77 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:53:19 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:47:42 +0000 From: John GM4SLV To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20110107114742.53ba84f3@opc2.twatt.home> In-Reply-To: <001f01cbae5c$01cc94c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <002801cbadf3$1e15bb70$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <1294359648.6336.6.camel@vaio3rd> <001501cbae53$54fee2a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4D26EE51.8010706@o2.ie> <001f01cbae5c$01cc94c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: JA GRRABBERS at a same time Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40054d26feeb3009 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:14:09 -0000 "mal hamilton" wrote: > Tony > In the electronic context. > There are CYCLES, KILOCYCLES and MEGACYCLES all related to FREQUENCY > of OCCURENCE No they aren't. They are related simply to NUMBER of OCCURRENCE. The quantification of "FREQUENCY of OCCURRENCE" requires a time reference during which the given "NUMBER of OCCURRENCES" happen. Which, of course, you neglect to give. CYCLES per Fortnight/week/day/hour/....? If you are going to use archaic units, then at least be accurate, scientific and unambiguous about it. But then again, scientific rigour has never been your strong point, has it. John GM4SLV