Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.143]) by air-dd02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD022-86304d387a22291; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:08:34 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 05E39380000B1; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pfyun-0008Ts-Fa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:07:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pfyum-0008Tj-Vo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:07:20 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfyuj-0006a2-4Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:07:20 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0GAFcIOE1cHY4g/2dsb2JhbACCQYFSjgMDhB2OG3OufJBEhFx0BIFfjH4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,352,1291593600"; d="scan'208,217";a="340615833" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.142.32]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 18:07:10 +0000 Message-ID: <005001cbb8cc$db1114c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <003401cbb8b7$f82129c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <413650202.736292.1295540964589.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb078> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:07:09 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126 Subject: Re: LF: Dream 9 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004D_01CBB8CC.DAB698B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f4d387a206e83 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CBB8CC.DAB698B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Horst I likewise am getting around 30 dB sig above noise with a non resonant= antenna.With my 137 Khz array resonated on 9 Kcs the improvement is= at least 20 dB better, unfortunately there is so little Dreamers acty diverting the= system is not worth while. 73 de Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Horst St=C3=B6cker=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:29 PM Subject: Re: LF: Dream 9 I've got the Alpha with -60 dB and about 25-30dB over noise. Maybe= I'll soon catch the first "dreamer". I am still not sure if my configurations are allright now. But tryin= g some antenna locations around my house brought the best result at th= e postition I have fixed the MiniWhip now. I hope, it's good enough. Otherwise I will have to quit thinking abo= ut receiving at home. Horst ----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ Von: "mal hamilton" Gesendet: 20.01.2011 16:37:38 An: rsgb Betreff: LF: Dream 9 VLF I had some spare time today and checked VLF Alpha on 11905 minus= 65 dB and loud with 150 metres non resonant inv L. My rx has a 1 Khz bfo offset and on speclab the calibration looks= ok for normal acty but at QRS600 it might be a different story!! RX af is LSB/USB selectable at 3 Khz and 20 Hz No signals visible on 8.9 Khz, nice clean screen Anyon active ? de mal/g3kev =20 =20 Empfehlen Sie WEB.DE DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir= =20 belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbun= g.web.de=20 ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CBB8CC.DAB698B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Horst
I likewise am getting around 30 dB si= g above noise=20 with a non resonant antenna.With my 137 Khz array resonated on 9 Kcs= the=20 improvement is at least 20 dB
better, unfortunately there is so lit= tle Dreamers=20 acty diverting the system is not worth while.
73 de Mal/G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 20,= 2011 4:29=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Dream 9

I've got the Alpha with -60 dB and about 25-30dB over= noise.=20 Maybe I'll soon catch the first "dreamer".
I am still not sure if= my=20 configurations are allright now. But trying some antenna locations= around my=20 house brought the best result at the postition I have fixed the Mini= Whip=20 now.
I hope, it's good enough. Otherwise I will have to quit thin= king about=20 receiving at home.
Horst

<= SPAN style=3D"COLOR: #000000">
Von: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
Ges= endet:=20 20.01.2011 16:37:38
An: rsgb=20 <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Betreff: LF: Dream= 9

VLF
I had= some spare=20 time today and checked VLF Alpha on 11905 minus 65 dB and loud wit= h 150=20 metres non resonant inv L.
My rx= has a 1 Khz=20 bfo offset and on speclab the calibration looks ok for normal acty= but at=20 QRS600 it might be a different story!!
RX af= is LSB/USB=20 selectable at 3 Khz and 20 Hz
No sig= nals visible=20 on 8.9 Khz, nice clean screen
Anyon= active=20 ?
de=20 mal/g3kev
 
  

3D""
Empfehlen=20 Sie WEB.DE DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und=20 wir   
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://fre= undschaftswerbung.web.de
------=_NextPart_000_004D_01CBB8CC.DAB698B0--