Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.13]) by air-md06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD064-8b8b4d26028412a; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:57:24 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AA8AF380000AD; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:57:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pau4W-00021L-ST for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:56:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pau4W-00021C-6X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:56:24 +0000 Received: from nm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.248]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pau4V-0006Kw-5F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:56:24 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.215] by nm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 17:56:17 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.178] by tm8.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 17:56:17 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 17:56:17 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 741559.98530.bm@omp1019.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 58298 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 17:56:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=1J+vNcpAxfWHWPeI4BXhIaGmThNNceNk18EMi+IKuDS8O4EZbpNB0/9dxEKAN1cY4aeEzxKR9dAtmoS/e4p35PX+6pHR/NRX8rt0yqIQgPrqGpVCQFJJ2LtMKMGZcbP+7byAKknKBJvtBn3pxL2IU23H2T9G5ZM88+WTjih0J4Y= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1294336577; bh=HeJ48y7Ak1xn5JhKnHKz+g4Z8OUiRcQwqBuxhX9kqpM=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=GqmwL+ndxsAersvg7iQgse7AXLxMYWwynd3IPwRhomQPOY+hF32PxdM4Dq71GnweAf36KjpyFpsd8OwCQLyL04foKFGxS1eRjMXGwZ0VqOgXzOETMueEQtIiH3ae0KS0DxkyOp/0uZFQ3jZdTgSiVlOgzCexte8vBWaQ4acndWI= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.157.31.254 with login) by smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jan 2011 17:56:14 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: ZLUe7YQVM1nozWskivL7xztJhW9Z7gZRLOPu0VDVsD8GKZr XSa79WgZsT_mFnjWDm6z6ZvPue_PXfRwjbWTVvvZ757__Z_3ffEnqs.4Q2oK h0EsswJxNpQOu0Yp4BAyqS8mue4LTueovu8l2cOt4yvzFSupFqxGTqkukSAO d0kd2QgO9RWrYTc_jVIwo8c0BwZZxJU7LsREYCaaB4q67SNT_Dc1uFtFFZMM YFzJLhyWzWZVjl9EWMohmpjEqihysv9VpjZK2C6TSZNIQr1xMvent2Ueuyj4 8UXTIblZlUtCcUMbiSMvjtlKDly9SfSfcoLA_N88vYFDH X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <002b01cbadcb$03716300$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <3F10330D89BC46B2B0071A38A6E5EC09@PCFausto>,<5961FA4401BA460E89A59A764DF00469@JimPC> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 17:55:39 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110106-0, 06/01/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: Vertical antenna and connection line Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d233.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d4d26028237f9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 This can have further difficulties......... the distributed reactances can result in resonance at unwanted frequencies. Andy G4JNT had such a problem many years back with coax used to connect to his antenna. I cant remember the detail but I think it (the feed system) just happened to resonate at either the 3rd or 5th harmonic of 136kHz and took out a couple of sets of PA FETs. So you have to be careful when you start separating the resonating components from the antenna like this.....the actual circuit may not be what you imagine!! You might get away with it like Stefan suggests (90% loading at the base, then line back to a small variometer to just have enough adjustment for tuning.) but check the impedance and resonances up to much higher freqiencies before you put power into it. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rik Strobbe" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:43 PM Subject: LF: RE: Re: Vertical antenna and connection line Fausto, I agree with Jim, a coax line is not usable due it it's high capacitance that will act as shunt (parallel) capacitance. Apart from the high voltage problem it will lower the impedance seen at the TX end (so you will have a high current). Whay I had in mind was a "ladder line" of 600 Ohm or more, where the capacitance is only a few pF per meter. Stefan's suggestion is also good, just put a small inductance inside to do the daily tuning and have the big coil outside. This will solve the voltage problem and will also make the transmission line capacitance far less critical. 73, Rik ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens James Moritz [james.moritz@btopenworld.com] Verzonden: donderdag 6 januari 2011 15:42 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: LF: Re: Vertical antenna and connection line Dear Fausto, LF Group, Beware of sweeping generalisations - I think the answer is that "it depends on the antenna". You need to think about your particular antenna carefully. At 136k, 20m of transmission line feeding a high impedance load (such as an electrically short vertical antenna) will behave essentially as a shunt capacitor. The capacitance of a high Zo open wire line is of the order of several pF per metre, which may be increased by being close to the ground. So your feeder would have capacitance of a few 100s of pF. This will be in parallel with the antenna impedance, which will be equivalent to a capacitor in series with a resistor. If the antenna capacitance is large compared to the feeder capacitance, the feeder will make little difference, while if the antenna capacitance is small compared to the feeder, the feeder current at the TX end will be much higher than the antenna current, leading to increased losses in the antenna tuner and feeder. So for small antennas, having the tuner close to the antenna is very desireable. So what is the capacitance of the antenna? According to your info on QRZ.com, the mast is 25m high, and you will be using it to suspend an inverted L for 137k - unless you have another 25m mast, I guess the inverted L top loading wire will actually be sloping... Your QTH seems to have plenty of space, so I guess it would be no problem to have at least 100m of wire in the top load. As a rough estimate, an isolated wire has about 6pF/m, so with a downlead, the capacitance might be 700pF. This would be about right for the variometer in the picture. So this would be substantially more than the capacitance of the feeder, which is good. But as Stefan and Rik say, another problem wil be the high voltage on the feeder. The voltage depends on the required antenna current. At your good QTH, with a sloping wire 25m high at one end, it should not be difficult to get an effective height >10m. This would have radiation resistance of about 30milliohms, and to achieve 1W ERP, an antenna current less than 4A would be needed. The reactance of 700pF at 137k is about 1700ohms, so 4A would result in a voltage of about 6.6kV. This is quite high, but should not be a problem for the antenna - many amateurs have managed to operate LF antennas at 20kV or so with reasonable reliability. However, it would require wide spacing, and careful design of insulators, for the transmission line. But why do you need the ladder line? If you want to have the tuner in the shack, from your photograph it looks like you could simply run a downlead from the top of the mast directly to the shack... This would have the minimum of loss and insulation problems. Hope this is helpful, Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fausto Coletti" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 11:28 AM Subject: LF: Vertical antenna and connection line Hello, A question for RF expert: you think that i can connect a Marconi antenna and relative gound system to the variometer with a high impedance ladder line?