Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.217]) by air-me06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME064-8bb74d07ecb734f; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:16:23 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C3BD6380000A0; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:16:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PSd9M-0006Qm-Ba for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:15:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PSd9L-0006Qd-Tg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:15:11 +0000 Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.97]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PSd9J-0007kB-CJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:15:11 +0000 Received: from mtaout-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.194]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oBEMEsKb010561 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:14:57 -0500 Received: from White (nrbg-4d073628.pool.mediaWays.net [77.7.54.40]) by mtaout-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id A134EE00010B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:14:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:15:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Why we need split bands Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01CB9BE4.CBAB21B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d94d07ecb559a1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CB9BE4.CBAB21B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gentlemen, currently we see a good example of why I keep nagging in favour of spl= it TA bands: http://df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/testTA1012142200.jpg Even a very subtle deficit in transmitted signal quality can have a ra= ther devastating effect on the noise floor of receiver sensitivity. No offense intended! Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CB9BE4.CBAB21B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gentlemen,
 
currently we see a good example&= nbsp;of why I=20 keep nagging in favour of split TA bands:
 
 
Even a very subtle deficit = in transmitted=20 signal quality can have a rather devastating effect on the= noise floor=20 of receiver sensitivity.
 
No offense intended!
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CB9BE4.CBAB21B0--