Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.27]) by air-db05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB054-86994d09456f2b6; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:47:11 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D09F3380000B4; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:47:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PT064-000385-G4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:45:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PT063-00037w-SN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:45:19 +0000 Received: from mail-iw0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PT060-0000Mo-9A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:45:19 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so2644494iwn.1 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:45:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=O7E+6k8WBtL3AFd4HQxjXci6mirOwl4YfCeJobUM8jQ=; b=PWda+f6SXMP8PE+76yZkqocFx1g8NBDBZ1Y7IU0VHpfib3tgd9haOeQC9NA8zlV/r/ TdocDkAVcawdYjnG7+zCdFfwenD7bXkGu68MF0StAnOvswofnL+bp3aRfpH1Yq2gPNSg lfnnDslCkuqCSs1xAaO/QOaekXQoys7X7vYSs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qN4IW5CItRzXrxceyu14E5aYcQF+qUP9vWzPre54NPUibGHsNluIaYS6eueAjOiFn3 ApwJO1qCHqb0UmIDJHX3/Rdj2N/IaJvqh1Hjp+s96AwVPTw2thlC/KEqhQjRXDir1PyR zm3uEHtggz7LU3+fEhYky0Ygp+/28aPJ4gp24= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.166.193 with SMTP id p1mr3537092icy.251.1292453113726; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.239.71 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:45:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6C355AC0E5D14465A04603AB7D2FC2E0@JimPC> References: <612542AE1A3F497CB206279B0F0F8ECA@IBM7FFA209F07C> <001701cb9b95$a5dc1f10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <6C355AC0E5D14465A04603AB7D2FC2E0@JimPC> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:45:13 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: G3XBM - very long carrier VLF transmission test Dec 15th Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8818bb873604977ab00b X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d257.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601b4d09456d332b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --90e6ba6e8818bb873604977ab00b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear Jim (and others), Very many thanks for trying to detect my Dreamer's Band signal today. I was aware of 3 stations definitely looking within 70km of my QTH and, not surprisingly, not one was successful. I was hoping that a couple of stations in the 10-20km range might have been looking and possibly might have had marginal copy. As it was, only more distant stations were, to my knowledge, looking. It is still possible some further reports will be received. If anyone is interested I have a record of my transmission sequence/times between 0900 and 2200z. The transmitter has now been turned off. I am most interested in the ERP calculation suggested by Marcus and will attempt to calculate the ERP for my present VLF system in the next few days. I suspect it will be <<1uW. With this data I expect someone here will be able to hazard a guess at what my far-field (radiated) range might theoretically be, although I suspect "not very far" field at all :-) My next test (probably after Christmas and in better weather) will be some 8.76kHz transmissions using the elevated (in the air) loop rather than the earth electrodes to compare range. I would also like to do some more "forensics" to try to better understand just how my signals are getting out across the fens as well as they do locally and of course to find the absolute limit of range with earth mode conduction or whatever mode it is. Thanks again - even negative results are results. 73s Roger G3XBM On 15 December 2010 22:10, James Moritz wrote: > Dear Roger, LF Group, > > I left the VLF RX set up on your stated frequency today, but no signals > have been detected so far. There was a rather curious spectrogram trace > close to your stated frequency - see attachment - but I assume this is local > QRM, since it repeats every 31Hz or so over the nearby frequency range, and > I have seen similar things here before a number of times. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU -- g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ www.g3xbm.co.uk www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --90e6ba6e8818bb873604977ab00b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Jim (and others),

Very many thanks for trying to detect my Dre= amer's Band signal today. I was aware of 3 stations definitely looking= within 70km of my QTH and, not surprisingly, not one was successful. I wa= s hoping that a couple of stations in the 10-20km range might have been lo= oking and possibly might have had marginal copy. As it was, only more dist= ant stations were, to my knowledge, looking. It is still possible some fur= ther reports will be received. If anyone is interested I have a record of= my transmission sequence/times between 0900 and 2200z. The transmitter ha= s now been turned off.

I am most interested in the ERP calculation suggested by Marcus and wi= ll attempt to calculate the ERP for my present VLF system in the next few= days. I suspect it will be <<1uW. With this data I expect someone= here will be able to hazard a guess at what my far-field (radiated) range= might theoretically be, although I suspect "not very far" field= at all :-)

My next test (probably after Christmas and in better weather) will be= some 8.76kHz transmissions using the elevated (in the air) loop rather th= an the earth electrodes to compare range. I would also like to do some mor= e "forensics" to try to better understand just how my signals ar= e getting out across the fens as well as they do locally and of course to= find the absolute limit of range with earth mode conduction or whatever= mode it is.

Thanks again - even negative results are results.

73s
Roger= G3XBM


On 15 December 2010 22:10, Ja= mes Moritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Dear Roger, LF= Group,

I left the VLF RX set up on your stated frequency today, but no signals ha= ve been detected so far. There was a rather curious spectrogram trace clos= e to your stated frequency - see attachment - but I assume this is local= QRM, since it repeats every 31Hz or so over the nearby frequency range,= and I have seen similar things here before a number of times.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU



--
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/=
www.g3xbm.co.= uk
www.youtub= e.com/user/g3xbm
<= /a>G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678=A0=A0=A0 ISWL G11088
--90e6ba6e8818bb873604977ab00b--