Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mp08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mp08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.193.76]) by air-db07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB074-869b4cfa777651; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:16:38 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EB1D3380000B9; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:16:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1POviH-000339-H4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:15:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1POviH-000330-0w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:15:57 +0000 Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1POviE-0006Gu-7F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:15:56 +0000 Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so1079830iwn.16 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:15:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sgl8wBtD3jp/tv+5JCQyzL6L9Jt1xxZyTpz7SHa1PMc=; b=jjMa4uS1IAZTu0UYFUhOCNsLh0TVwNdqcwzSnguGTTxSw2xyG1bXQLLqLKNBEYOpXA LkoGzmwAv9yaU7MfLrhgeT59Ny4wncBBEOXq1nkbirXmQMCEQjctkiXjBRPhy7FEjPja ulUNrBrH30cpZayWskB5LdFNKbjo9k2WOWSoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lUECouvIWHOvk5f2/Oi4wVtPDoi9QIMrFZp81D93ifOcXBFqFSi7NWhsw8uXGrqONs 1yT4XvCF0ytX9x6teGLUMJDbbPNBo1TIxL3yHVsUb6yQxzOKYysqpe5+k8ztnX11MVF8 CKoR16FmQwwV5+ciAqgMV6rJ/eCeiYwCxKVo0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.16.195 with SMTP id p3mr3410330iba.62.1291482951193; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.199.7 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:15:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <939733C64B494932A06C9B3D9C76ABD5@IBM7FFA209F07C> <006701cb93d0$7a451720$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:15:51 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Delays Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221534d6478a15a2049698ce38 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m221.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14c4cfa777464e9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --00221534d6478a15a2049698ce38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 And you can choose how to have messages delivered. A daily digest would be a good option for those not actually operating on L/MF at the moment who currently get deluged, particularly at weekends. Andy www.g4jnt.com On 4 December 2010 16:48, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Sorry to go on about this, but a Yahoo Groups version of the LF-reflector > would serve our needs better IMHO. > > A group for sub-9kHz has already been set up. See > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sub9khz/ , but it would take 5 mins for > moderators here (are there any?) to set up the direct equivalent of this > group on Yahoo with all the advantages of web based message reading (if > required/preferred - users choose), 100GB photo storage, full message > archives and search facilities, file storage, polls, databases, ability to > moderate, ban mal-content members, etc etc. > > 73 > Roger G3XBM > > > > O forn 4 December 2010 16:29, Alan Melia wrote: > >> Hi Chris, I am on BT Internet as well and I am getting messages within 4 >> mins when posted by UK stations. Certainly one of the mesages from Germany >> took nearly half an hour to come through, so it may be congestion >> en-route. >> Reflector messages are 2nd priority to a lot of ISPs, and nodes. >> >> Alan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chris" >> To: "RSGB LF Group" >> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 4:03 PM >> Subject: LF: Delays >> >> >> LF, >> Is anyone else experiencing long delays with messages being relayed by >> this >> site? It's rather screwing up keeping track of what Stefans up to here. >> Chris, G4AYT. >> >> >> > > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 > --00221534d6478a15a2049698ce38 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And you can choose how to have messages delivered.=A0=A0 A daily dige= st would be a good option for those not actually operating on L/MF at the= moment who currently get deluged, particularly at weekends.
=A0
Andy


=A0
On 4 December 2010 16:48, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@= gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry to go on about this, but= a Yahoo Groups version of the LF-reflector would serve our needs better= IMHO.

A group for sub-9kHz has already been set up. See http://tech.groups.y= ahoo.com/group/sub9khz/ , but it would take 5 mins for moderators here= (are there any?) to set up the direct equivalent of this group on Yahoo= with all the advantages of web based message reading (if required/preferr= ed - users choose), 100GB photo storage, full message archives and search= facilities, file storage, polls, databases, ability to moderate, ban mal-= content members, etc etc.

73
Roger G3XBM



O forn 4 December 2010 16:29, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com> wrote:
Hi Chris, I am on= BT Internet as well and I am getting messages within 4
mins when poste= d by UK stations. Certainly one of the mesages from Germany
took nearly half an hour to come through, so it may be congestion en-route= .
Reflector messages are 2nd priority to a lot of ISPs, and nodes.
<= br>Alan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <= ;c.ashby435= @btinternet.com>
To: "RSGB LF Group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sa= turday, December 04, 2010 4:03 PM
Subject: LF: Delays


LF,Is anyone else experiencing long delays with messages being relayed by th= is
site? It's rather screwing up keeping track of what Stefans up to here= .
Chris, G4AYT.




--
http:= //g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.= uk
= http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678=A0=A0=A0 IS= WL G11088

--00221534d6478a15a2049698ce38--