Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.136]) by air-mb02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB021-a18f4d1e159e2da; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:40:46 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EA1AF380000AF; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:40:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PYix0-0004mW-TK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:39:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PYix0-0004mN-3F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:39:38 +0000 Received: from nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.252]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PYix0-0007u1-05 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:39:38 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.217] by nm15.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Dec 2010 17:39:32 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.176] by tm10.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Dec 2010 17:39:32 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Dec 2010 17:39:32 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 182178.6029.bm@omp1017.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 85744 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Dec 2010 17:39:32 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1293817172; bh=CnEKjpfEVspr5r5b4lwIWzGjWYaDtrc8FPe++5aS4pA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=z+vZlETdEU9WqxolSEbVqVXdK9iKDaEUic5IbNpJmexrHL/Um8KvWA0faWK6yYpMtHg8aNSO8t+n7TWp7pUl42aOgGKm51hw0GTTNl6xhFgBvSOGAhNzKI7yKAjyNgkRqjn6k8xZC7ztzA1aGP0M4JBhmZVJ6YRP3lAi6jcp/pU= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gjeLOpc24OeN+l7CgT/SLSXSRRbEe3V8W4Tibyhv0I6KpY8MUAfVoqhU6d6q5zmwIwchONA483VG0F596cYDTf8QzU4HVGryMyeWrj+0roUviPnzB2eIYWLJaJNAI91dB8GnRDCHMVXZWiRcnsC0+3YKN8tBHyp2x7xCKo6mJ4A=; Message-ID: <9556.85578.qm@web28511.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: rrDQ07IVM1k7x0Hw7E4RoZJAaYkXIh3lhpVv_HE.oFhH78E wPNrWrNdiKPmKVfK6xfIhh_gMlIuZO5xL2xRVQceEsVQ.zjnCnFbON7GAlZC yYwiIPdWmJJN2q42k51_JUiDeY6RPuHZ_FljB8zccjqvPrfiJaUuH4E1giJw 0K96LBn4i2vgITAx8Zu3aZ6pqMPgmYdCmvqdI5bJ3nNFrt_RE7qhEaNlEUlU Hai5ri8.7t4685n6qKJ_Gv2jt7bkT.vd.Ve.Allv.3gLIdQ-- Received: from [81.97.191.183] by web28511.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:39:31 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <11250.89514.qm@web28501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4D1DC897.2060606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <76636.6973.qm@web28508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1567AC3A96624647ADC1F52EF1A1E625@JimPC> <4D1E0C5D.9000608@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:39:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Osborn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4D1E0C5D.9000608@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1472965040-1293817171=:85578" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m276.2 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40884d1e15996c82 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 --0-1472965040-1293817171=:85578 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Many thanks Stefan, I believe that Jim is about 38 km distant and I will check. The signal Jim received was certainly on the correct frequency and the rig= ht=20 time to have been me That's a good idea about using the inverted 'L' and balloon aerial in para= llel;=20 I shall try that. My big concern with balloon aerials here is that should the wire touch a= =20 neighbour's TV aerial I imagine that his TV, radio, stereo etc will go zap! The balloons soon deflate and the wire starts to sag so I have to keep a= =20 constant watch on it. I am pretty much surrounded by tall trees or houses and the wind is consta= ntly=20 varying in direction. I may try more balloons next time and get a bit more lift. They were not especially expensive and 50 balloons and a disposable canist= er of=20 helium gas was only =A332 on E-Bay. 73 Chris G3XIZ ________________________________ From: Stefan Sch=E4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Fri, 31 December, 2010 17:01:17 Subject: Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ Congratulations to the new record Chris, Jim, What is the exact distance? Some 10 km i think. http://no.nonsense.ee/qthm= ap/ Chris, can't you use the inv-L and the balloon antenna in parallel? This= lowers=20 the voltage and needed L, so less losses. And you can make QRO without=20 increasing the HV problems. If you come back to the same antenna voltage,= you=20 will surely improve the ERP! And the resonance is rather less affected by= the=20 vertical antenna movement due to wind since the inv-L part stays constant! If you increase the wire length to 60m (limit in UK) you would increase th= e=20 efficiency by up to 50% and lower the voltage by 20%! Nice success just some minutes before 2011 :-) 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC Am 31.12.2010 14:54, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Chris, LF Group, >=20 > I seem to have a trace on your frequency - see attachment. SNR is curren= tly=20 >around 15dB with 1.5millihertz FFT resolution. It definitely wasn't there= before=20 >;-) >=20 > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU=20 =20 --0-1472965040-1293817171=:85578 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Many thanks Stefan,

I believe that Jim is about 38 km dis= tant and I will check.
The signal Jim received was certainly on the cor= rect frequency and the right time to have been me

That's a good ide= a about using the inverted 'L' and balloon aerial in parallel; I shall try= that.

My big concern with balloon aerials here is that should the= wire touch a neighbour's TV aerial
I imagine that his TV, radio, stere= o etc will go zap!
The balloons soon deflate and the wire starts to sag= so I have to keep a constant watch on it.
I am pretty much surrounded= by tall trees or houses and the wind is constantly varying in direction.<= br>
I may try more balloons next time and get a bit more lift.
They= were not especially expensive and 50 balloons and a disposable canister= of helium gas was
only =A332 on E-Bay.

73 Chris
G3XIZ


From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de&g= t;
To: rsgb_lf_group@b= lacksheep.org
Sent: Fr= i, 31 December, 2010 17:01:17
Sub= ject: Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ

Congratulations to the= new record Chris, Jim,

What is the exact distance? Some 10 km i th= ink. http://no= .nonsense.ee/qthmap/

Chris, can't you use the inv-L and the bal= loon antenna in parallel? This lowers the voltage and needed L, so less lo= sses. And you can make QRO without increasing the HV problems. If you come back to the same antenna= voltage, you will surely improve the ERP! And the resonance is rather les= s affected by the vertical antenna movement due to wind since the inv-L pa= rt stays constant!
If you increase the wire length to 60m (limit in UK)= you would increase the efficiency by up to 50% and lower the voltage by= 20%!
Nice success just some minutes before 2011 :-)

73, GL, Ste= fan/DK7FC




Am 31.12.2010 14:54, schrieb James Moritz:> Dear Chris, LF Group,
>
> I seem to have a trace on you= r frequency - see attachment. SNR is currently around 15dB with 1.5millihe= rtz FFT resolution. It definitely wasn't there before ;-)
>
>= Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU


--0-1472965040-1293817171=:85578--