Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi02.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.155]) by air-mb08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB084-a8064d1b0a112c0; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:14:41 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 38534380000A0; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:14:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PXt2N-0005Np-ME for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:13:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PXt2M-0005Ng-Tw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:13:42 +0000 Received: from nm12.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.186]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PXt2M-00069P-R2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:13:42 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.209] by nm12.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2010 10:13:36 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.175] by tm2.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2010 10:13:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2010 10:13:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 799459.11158.bm@omp1016.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 66173 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Dec 2010 10:13:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1293617616; bh=OCfItd5JzsDHq2Wql8zbRMAnrXwm9IJzgwxUWmkz3qs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fD9qdBpuSehOZB67HFmFdIQgRpRM1BEmZ7Qr63q+9zffi0+altXp4MpMQcBfYOqyP9enJs6ruP3rdiFlnnGp8HB2NU1Kkzt755IjwUjTlD/AeSr4UyFroAQQRr6xyRd/Xv0SiQ7S9EzK6HewvqmsZe6MywAaYnz/NvW7w5CVJUE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=M5yn7+Sk9LR6SwIr5pTHqUx796DXJ/IaoB9NoXp4qAc3Zab8GJTAfDpTImcb+QHvLKai+XG8HO1u3W9pZD+raZ8KUAk6xP2EI9hfZJlZaa3HiXpblSolhB0QulZlcIse3ySguKq3oMM5vZ+PVOEn+G8121i0ffW4YvOYjqvQalE=; Message-ID: <677318.41353.qm@web28511.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: ZoAn3SoVM1mUgIzh1R0jVFjRzhB7FdYw1Z8PjgFwoSwLH4V KQ0i02ZwFAVdCklkye4KXgHVxSMffi2pUsE_XoZSnDnLfExnBm6cSoZm5mJQ EXG05eXaBrW5MACafkKQHrl9TrOKNsuH.IloLAP8U3kVckQoaSSWraelUvPD FCbMUMQbYevORNSumx5B91HSgGZFFUIBTyZaT3837Sh8LxNA6bEl22tepOq_ _G9PFwDr69jBHITQa.7D3UIV0JJy2jtvV_BKVNKOCuGXwpr5JnzTLTvwxODA 8wwV28Ce48GKxlx4TGe1oHaKVqfPOHz0- Received: from [81.97.191.183] by web28511.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:13:36 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <29880.89039.qm@web28513.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:13:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Osborn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: VLF Loading Coil Problems - G3XIZ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2088707557-1293617616=:41353" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m260.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039400cdeca4d1b0a0f650f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-2088707557-1293617616=:41353 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maybe you're right Andy. The coil was intermittent and gently moving the turns with a paint brush= cured=20 the problem temporarily. That's why I 'assumed' it was a s/cct turn and subsequently rewound the bo= ttom=20 section. I'm now wondering whether the quick-dry varnish I used to cement the fine= wire=20 in place has lowered the Q All suggestions welcome 73 Chris G3XIZ ________________________________ From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wed, 29 December, 2010 9:44:33 Subject: Re: LF: VLF Loading Coil Problems - G3XIZ On a large air cored coil I would have thought a shorted turn would just= shift=20 the inductance very slilghtly - rather than lowering the Q significantly. Andy www.g4jnt.com =20 =20 On 29 December 2010 08:26, Chris Osborn wrote: LF, > >Many thanks for all efforts, advice and suggestions from members of the= group. >I shall E-mail them personally within the next few days. > >I spent several hours yesterday re-winding a section of my VLF loading co= il. >There are abour 1200 turns of 0.2 mm wire which had to be hand wound at= a rate=20 >of 4 turns per minute (max). > >I was disappointed (to say the least) when the coil resonated at the corr= ect=20 >frequency but had a very low Q. >Either there's a short-circuit in the other section of the coil or I've= =20 >introduced a short into the newly re-wound part. >In any event I am QRT until I can sort the problem. > >I have social engagements today and will take another look at it tomorrow= . > >73 >Chris G3XIZ > > > > =20 --0-2088707557-1293617616=:41353 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Maybe you're right Andy.
The coil was intermittent and gently= moving the turns with a paint brush cured the problem temporarily.
Tha= t's why I 'assumed' it was a s/cct turn and subsequently rewound the botto= m section.

I'm now wondering whether the quick-dry varnish I used= to cement the fine wire in place has lowered the Q

All suggestions= welcome

73
Chris
G3XIZ


Fr= om: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
= Sent: Wed, 29 December, 20= 10 9:44:33
Subject: Re= : LF: VLF Loading Coil Problems - G3XIZ

On a large air= cored coil I would have thought a shorted turn would just shift the induc= tance very slilghtly -  rather than lowering the Q significantly= .
Andy
 

 
On 29 December 2010 08:26, Chris Osborn <g3xiz@yahoo.co.uk= > wrote:
LF,

Many thanks for all efforts, advice and suggestions from= members of the group.
I shall E-mail them personally within the next= few days.

I spent several hours yesterday re-winding a section of= my VLF loading coil.
There are abour 1200 turns of  0.2 mm wire which had to be hand wound= at a rate of 4 turns per minute (max).

I was disappointed (to say= the least) when the coil resonated at the correct frequency but had a ver= y low Q.
Either there's a short-circuit in the other section of the coil or I've in= troduced a short into the newly re-wound part.
In any event I am QRT un= til I can sort the problem.

I have social engagements today and wil= l take another look at it tomorrow.

73
Chris G3XIZ



=

--0-2088707557-1293617616=:41353--