Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.220]) by air-di06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI061-eaca4cf66bf8220; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:38:32 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4931C38000459; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:38:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PNokR-0002ht-HA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:37:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PNokR-0002hk-5M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:37:35 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PNokP-0005x9-T1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:37:35 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB1Fac6j031839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:36:38 +0100 Received: from [129.206.29.99] (pc99.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.99]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id oB1FbVI2019665 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:37:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF66B0C.4080002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:34:36 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20101201111952.27783.qmail@web100009.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> <4CF65820.8075.82623C@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <4CF65820.8075.82623C@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: ARGO Help Needed by JA7NI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60dc4cf66bf51226 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Mike, Am 01.12.2010 15:13, schrieb Mike Dennison: >> JA7NI, Kuni, is looking for someone that can provide him >> with a modified ARGO capable of displaying a wider freq >> coverage at QRSS120. >> > The solution is to use SpecLab, see > http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/spectra1.html > This is more complex then Argo, but is much more flexible. Several Eu > grabbers (eg DF6NM) use this software and the operators will be able > to give advice. > Yes, one can easily cover 10 Hz in QRSS-120. > I do not believe that setting a grabber to QRSS120 is useful. Why do you think that? If someone transmits a short character like "A" by RN3AGC, it would take 4 minutes. Do you think the propagation does change so rapidly? And if a QRSS-120 grabber is not useful, why do you transmit "X" in QRSS-120 and not in QRSS-60? 73, Stefan