Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.144]) by air-dc02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC023-864e4cfa9917196; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:40:07 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A2A84380000C0; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:40:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1POxx7-0005oP-EU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:39:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1POxx7-0005oG-1v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:39:25 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1POxx5-0007TH-FD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:39:25 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuMFAN4n+kxcHYsB/2dsb2JhbACRG4QAjhNxvneFSQSBXIw/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,299,1288569600"; d="scan'208,217";a="334581248" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.139.1]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Dec 2010 19:39:17 +0000 Message-ID: <00c401cb93ea$ee6248c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00a401cb93e5$d647e1a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <363BF54E-8601-4A29-8E90-DBC4FC5F6742@numeo.fr> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:39:13 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 600 QRM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C1_01CB93EA.EE376830" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40904cfa9913729b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror ------=_NextPart_000_00C1_01CB93EA.EE376830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stop all unattended Beacons would help, whereas in QSO mode one can ta= ke evasive action to avoid QRM. G3KEV ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John Rabson=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 7:29 PM Subject: Re: LF: 600 QRM On 4 Dec 2010, at 20:02CET, mal hamilton wrote: This past couple of nights 500 is so QRL that QRM could be a probl= em. Perhaps QRO stations should observe Silence Periods to allow weaker= signals to be received? John F5VLF ------=_NextPart_000_00C1_01CB93EA.EE376830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stop all unattended Beacons would hel= p, whereas in=20 QSO mode one can take evasive action to avoid QRM.
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John=20 Rabson
Sent: Saturday, December 04,= 2010 7:29=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 600 QRM

On 4 Dec 2010, at 20:02CET, mal hamilton wrote:

This past couple of nights 500 is= so QRL that=20 QRM could be a problem.

= Perhaps QRO=20 stations should observe Silence Periods to allow weaker signals= to be=20 received?

John F5VLF

------=_NextPart_000_00C1_01CB93EA.EE376830--