Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.212]) by air-dd09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD093-865f4cf6c59c275; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:01:00 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1C6EF38000099; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PNuiZ-0006I7-6W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:00:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PNuiY-0006Hy-NH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:00:02 +0000 Received: from smtp4.mail.ru ([94.100.176.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PNuiW-0000Fx-3Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:00:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Subject:References:To:From:Message-ID; bh=E6aezCMN7VIc8yXkzzCgoD9AtscUrwi5Fjfgk3Fsytw=; b=f63UpLvP05S/oH9kNdakywQa4fgcG9bDnTi1/6N9kv4cC7c2nZCvaNPGv4drkMfE5/Nx3oTd+xLHu8d0/ZuXEEvotDLxhhOMIR2dF4el89yURliV0oUDXLdBtR4761ME; Received: from [79.98.8.6] (port=24173 helo=EFREMOV) by smtp4.mail.ru with asmtp id 1PNuiP-0000ra-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:59:53 +0300 X-Nat-Received: 172.16.10.160 Message-ID: <00b401cb91a3$0760eb00$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> From: "rn3agc" To: References: <4CF65D62.21930.96EDB2@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <4CF672A2.6040506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005001cb917a$15cb1720$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <63F0E942-FAC1-4DAF-911A-2BEEDD7995F1@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:59:05 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mras: Ok X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: QRSS120 and grabbers Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m232.1 ; domain : mail.ru DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d44cf6c59976c4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello LF'ers, My modest opinion - isn't present sense to do grabbers with a speed more 60s/dot. Concerning superlong modes... Definitely, in it there is a sense. When the signal level so weak that it is commensurate with the level of noise, a long "strips" can be identified! 73 Andrey