Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.30]) by air-da03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA033-863b4cf260781e1; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:00:24 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0E0C13800016E; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PMhn4-0008TW-St for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:59:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PMhn4-0008TN-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:59:42 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.151] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PMhn2-0000HM-LQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:59:42 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3539.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7E21C1C00094 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3539.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 701AE1C0009A for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.58.137]) by mwinf3539.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id CE3E11C00094 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:59:31 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20101128135931845.CE3E11C00094@mwinf3539.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <9DA34185EF634CFE89F265C643104781@AGB> <439635.1425.qm@web28101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <00d801cb8d6c$e6f9dc30$0217aac0@desktop> In-Reply-To: <00d801cb8d6c$e6f9dc30$0217aac0@desktop> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:59:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101128-0, 28/11/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB8F04.7AA22940" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601e4cf2607625fa X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB8F04.7AA22940 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No progress , filters , position nothing worked , So Just checked the speed and re fitted the old modem ...only = to find it giving the same up and down load speed as the new on= e 6.5 meg / 0.85 meg , previously up was 0.55 meg max ... fine , th= e old router is rated at 10 meg max , so I may not see 9 as the= new one gave 'occasionally'=20 I have the idea that the faster up speed is perhaps making the= bigger improvement to overall performance=20 Both have FCC mark ,=20 EDIMAX , FCC Ref 'PART 15 ' 1&2=20 Netgear has FCC ID : PY309300114 (no hits in google .. odd) In use >> Edimax AR7024WG =20 out of use Netgear DGS1000=20 G.. From: James Cowburn=20 Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 1:21 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: RE: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof ? Dear All, =20 As a precaution I wound the phone and power leads to my old ADSL netge= ar 834WG router on to separate red ferrite rings and have also used th= e big clamp on ferrites too and it sits quite happily with RF, even wh= en I have the TL922 on at legal limit. It my /A QTH in NI I have a Sk= y broadband router and that's in the same room as the atu/balun and en= d of my long wire, so far from ideal in terms of RF good practice, thi= s too is fine with 100W out from my TS570 except on 40m and topband wh= ere the ATU seems to struggle and so mismatch is causing some interfer= ence which drops the ADSL. =20 =20 For me I use the ferrite winding pattern as is oft described in the RS= GB tomes. =20 Curiously, ferrites did not cure my very noisy APC UPS (1000W unit) an= d this renders 1 to 30MHz unuseable as a cacophony of bubbles and sque= als migrates up and down numerous simultaneous 5MHz segments. My 70= 0W version of the APC is fine. =20 Hey ho =20 With best to all =20 =20 Jim G7NKS (back to the coil winding for VLF) =20 p.s. Thanks Roger for the namecheck in this months PW =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB8F04.7AA22940 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No  progress , filters  ,= position =20 nothing  worked ,
 
So  Just checked the  speed=   and=20  re fitted the  old  modem ...only  to  find= it giving=20 the  same  up and  down load speed as the  new&nbs= p;=20 one  6.5 meg / 0.85 meg , previously up  was  0.55 meg= max ...=20 fine , the old  router is rated at  10 meg  max , so I= may =20 not  see  9 as the  new one gave  'occasional= ly'=20
 
I have the  idea  that = ; the =20 faster  up speed  is perhaps making  the bigger = =20 improvement  to  overall   performance
 
Both have  FCC  mark = ,=20
 
EDIMAX  ,  FCC  Ref 'P= ART 15=20 '   1&2
Netgear has FCC   ID  :&nbs= p; PY309300114=20 (no hits in google .. odd)
 
In use  >>  Edimax&nb= sp; =20 AR7024WG 
out of use   Netgear DGS100= 0=20
 
G..
 

Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 1:21 PM
Subject: RE: LF: Any ADSL2 BBand router / RF proof=20 ?

Dear=20 All,

 

As a=20 precaution I wound the phone and power leads to my old ADSL netgear 83= 4WG router=20 on to separate red ferrite rings and have also used the big clamp on= ferrites=20 too and it sits quite happily with RF, even when I have the TL922 on= at legal=20 limit.  It my /A QTH in NI I have a Sky broadband router and that= =92s in the=20 same room as the atu/balun and end of my long wire, so far from ideal= in terms=20 of RF good practice, this too is fine with 100W out from my TS570 exce= pt on 40m=20 and topband where the ATU seems to struggle and so mismatch is causing= some=20 interference which drops the ADSL.  

 

For me I use=20 the ferrite winding pattern as is oft described in the RSGB=20 tomes.

 

Curiously,=20 ferrites did not cure my very noisy APC UPS (1000W unit) and this rend= ers 1 to=20 30MHz unuseable as a cacophony of bubbles and squeals migrates up and= down=20 numerous simultaneous 5MHz segments.    My 700W version= of the=20 APC is fine.

 

Hey=20 ho

 

With best to=20 all

 

 

Jim=20 G7NKS  (back to the coil winding for VLF)

 

p.s. Thanks=20 Roger for the namecheck in this months PW

 

 



------=_NextPart_000_002C_01CB8F04.7AA22940--