Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.20]) by air-mb03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB032-a21d4cd01ad53d0; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:06:13 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0143C380002C6; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:06:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PDHSk-0007KR-Dy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:03:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PDHSj-0007KI-VT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:03:45 +0000 Received: from mail-gx0-f171.google.com ([209.85.161.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PDHSh-0005he-62 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:03:45 +0000 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so4145993gxk.16 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YpQ0FADMvBVQ6kFFLUndRSuNri+jpNKuZRv8AF3ZwfA=; b=v+sKxrvliJymj0+PsG6epXRUjfuFpnTI5NdATUF0xG94lwMbDCVsWD67nwJ+/pK0Er +kfopp9QLGXkHsZmRD82wT7meJlBxGy545GqIb1Gk9mrY36NcwL36HXszYs/DsoGimih tmT/XYQO7jOd/MuhZZpxnoS08I4DDGPDzHO6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vA6woXS+gLJcnMbTl+r7ogFT94m1A1gkZBQb4dcUhkVzYveqyheSE5vQqnn0hr8iAl P5ok2BcUMt5FjLPvGHAwrKpFQTEtNG6HuA87FRfdP4HSdRitdB6wX2CPfi/UrCiRj/n0 lUL+sWCc8BtFcw/PJDu/bPyq2qpO1GwbhBAPA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.74.147 with SMTP id u19mr668819qcj.214.1288706616408; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.185.6 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <007b01cb7a91$ceb8df60$4001a8c0@lark> References: <20101101233708.02b5f67d@opc1> <007b01cb7a91$ceb8df60$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:03:36 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: The Wideband Noise Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d282.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60144cd01aca330f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello the list, =A0=A0 The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is primarily a trade group but does have standing on these issues. The IMO doesn't deploy anything itself, what it does do is lobby governments to deploy these systems. If the ARRL had better lobbyists they would take then on directly, rather the strategy seems to be "we'll take any crumbs that fall off the table and be grateful for it". I find it interesting that the IMO let the MF spectrum lie dormant for decades only to rediscover an interest in it the moment someone else looked at using the spectrum! -- 73 Warren K2ORS =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Alan Melia wro= te: > > Whoa hardly an intrusion we are not a primary user we have to take what > interference they give. Some seem to forget this is not an amateur band= it > is commercial spectrum and we have an experimental permit. Also the nois= e > increase showed on your plot is minimal ~1dB .....speclab is extermenly > sensitive....what you are showing would probably be regarded as > insignificant. > > I think this may be the French taking their normal stance of not wanting= to > rely on US satellites and systems and trying to mollify > redundancy-threatened radio engineers :-)) =A0cf =A0Loran-C. : > > Alan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary - G4WGT" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:50 AM > Subject: Re: LF: The Wideband Noise > > > > Hi John & LF, > > > > The screen shot attached shows an average strength of the 498 to 502kH= z > > signal here in NW England (IO83QO). QSB has an effect on the signal wh= ich > > continues throughout the darkness periods. > > > > This intrusion into the UK 500kHz band makes reception difficult. > > > > 73, > > > > Gary - G4WGT. > > > > > > > > On 1 November 2010 23:37, John P-G wro= te: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've had some correspondence with John G3WKL and Colin G3PSM about= the > > > new "commercial" wideband data noise that occupies 498-502kHz > > > > > > It seems to be a test of an impending data system for marine use. > > > > > > Colin would like some information about where, and when, it can be > > > heard or otherwise detected. It appears to be being driven by the > > > French. > > > > > > Forthe record I can hear it here in Shetland. It faded up tonight at > > > approx 1615 UTC and is audible and visible on a waterfall display. > > > > > > I haven't been in a position to DF it, but in the first instance Col= in > > > would like to gather some information about where it is being receiv= ed. > > > > > > I can collate the information for him if anyone who is affected by,= or > > > can simply detect, this noise/data signal could give details either > > > direct, or via the LF group. I know a lot of discussion has been had > > > already, but a quick note now could be useful, as there is a meeting > > > soon to discuss this, and other aspects of WRC2012. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > John > > > GM4SLV > > > > > > > > > >