Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.205]) by air-mc04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC042-a9304ced856e216; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:36:46 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 63843380000F2; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:36:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PLN0H-0001mV-Bo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:35:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PLN0G-0001mM-Sn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:35:48 +0000 Received: from outbound03.telus.net ([199.185.220.222]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLN0C-00088p-BJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:35:48 +0000 Received: from edtnaa04.telusplanet.net ([75.157.163.113]) by priv-edtnes29.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20101124213541.FIEF1706.priv-edtnes29.telusplanet.net@edtnaa04.telusplanet.net> for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:35:41 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.66] (d75-157-163-113.bchsia.telus.net [75.157.163.113]) by edtnaa04.telusplanet.net (BorderWare Security Platform) with ESMTP id E1B0A2E1EBE4A04E for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:35:40 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4CED852C.3000809@telus.net> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:35:40 +0000 From: Scott Tilley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <861077.53684.qm@web28512.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <863803.39905.qm@web28510.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <001701cb8aec$6dd12890$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <4CEBEEEA.5050403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001701cb8bb4$1088b540$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> In-Reply-To: X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ZXIJJxseqmLAWHe2SFgi88NGGrvnz3TL2QeftqrkQc= c=1 sm=0 a=fZJloBWO1wW5k1qUllWWvA==:17 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=fnYqA7hvAAAA:8 a=j6Q1dnSHAAAA:8 a=A06HpNCPAAAA:20 a=lOpjsaJwilgXyze0PvEA:9 a=Zm5MIsKqGoiq_J7mgqv1knty-fAA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=muIvw5a9-cgA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=gA6IeH5FQcgA:10 a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10 a=Hdef71vLGlWVW2be:21 a=zkWCcQbpDMhg19V7:21 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=TtUGoxil7y5f_OhGpKwA:9 a=3Il0oP9Yi4PdrEZik1YA:7 a=N0jOcfekHYNoLix1p_EjM6Ve0iMA:4 a=No6EIF1O_0hBOjFm:21 a=EQkKkfIzusL8d7xl:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF Transmissions Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020307090709070103090608" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd4ced856c7150 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------020307090709070103090608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Roger It was bound to happen as the Infinite /Monkey/ Theorem requires. Where, Monkey =3D Mal Typewriters =3D Emails The Theorem: "If you put an infinite number of monkeys at typewriters, eventually one= =20 will bash out the script for Hamlet." Please don't get overwhelmed at the concept of an infinite number of=20 Mals, I'm only drawing an analogy and certainly not suggesting we really= =20 need an infinite number of Mals. 73 Scott On 11/24/2010 10:29 AM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > For once I agree with you Mal. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > > On 24 November 2010 08:46, mal hamilton > wrote: > > Stefan and Co > This is the point that I was making. Maybe an iron courtain > stretched around UK is the next step by the met office. > The situation is laughable so is the 500 Kc licence in Germany > where you can TX a beacon but not allowed to RX and have a QSO. > With the Federal EU state why is every country different when it > comes to radio permits > g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Stefan Sch=E4fer > > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 23, 2010 4:42 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: VLF Transmissions > > Hi Roger, > > Am 23.11.2010 12:51, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: >> They also require copies of a log showing the actual activity >> so they can check if they were being interfered with (I book >> for a day but may only be testing for a couple of hours). > > Have they asked you to keep them informed about _my_ > transmissions too? Or is it not of interest for them what > happens outside UK (although the signal can be received in UK > at good strenght too)? Just a quastion of interest ;-) > > 73, Stefan > > > > > --=20 > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --------------020307090709070103090608 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roger

It was bound to happen as the Infinite Monkey Theorem requires. 

Where,

Monkey = Mal

Typewriters = Emails

The Theorem:
"If you put an infinite number of monkeys at typewriters, eventually one will bash out the script for Hamlet."

Please don't get overwhelmed at the concept of an infinite number of Mals, I'm only drawing an analogy and certainly not suggesting we really need an infinite number of Mals.

73 Scott





On 11/24/2010 10:29 AM, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
For once I agree with you Mal.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 24 November 2010 08:46, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
Stefan and Co
This is the point that I was making. Maybe an iron courtain stretched around UK is the next step by the met office.
The situation is laughable so is the 500 Kc licence in Germany where you can TX a beacon but not allowed to RX and have a QSO.
With the Federal EU state why is every country different when it comes to radio permits
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF Transmissions

Hi Roger,

Am 23.11.2010 12:51, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
They also require copies of a log showing the actual activity so they can check if they were being interfered with (I book for a day but may only be testing for a couple of hours).

Have they asked you to keep them informed about my transmissions too? Or is it not of interest for them what happens outside UK (although the signal can be received in UK at good strenght too)? Just a quastion of interest ;-)

73, Stefan



--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
--------------020307090709070103090608--