Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.211]) by air-mb01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB013-a1874cec3663250; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:47:15 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8EE6138000139; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:47:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PL0gi-0000St-CY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:46:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PL0gi-0000Sk-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:46:08 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0gg-0007yk-7r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:46:07 +0000 Received: from cpbrm-ews17.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.148]) by cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:46:00 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-EML109.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.13]) by cpbrm-ews17.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:46:00 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.13] ([62.131.23.134]) by CPSMTPM-EML109.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18222); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:46:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4CEC3618.7020806@kpnmail.nl> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:46:00 +0100 From: pa3abk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <004701cb8b3d$a58e3f60$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>,<6C9DB6EDC3334B4A9548F4AD7BE3F09B@louis> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2010 21:46:00.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1B1FEF0:01CB8B57] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: EA4BVZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d34cec36611dda X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) I assumed he used the ex Madridrdo equipment. Very strong tx but bad listener, or should we have called him just after his traffic list.? CQ is in fact not wrong, but would be better to use a serie of V's or text stating test or beacon. Now the first trigger is to call him. On the other end, possible he didn't expect that his transmission could have this range and didn't bother to check his receiver. If he is working with 5W he certainly put a nice sig here at QRB1500Km I clocked him with 549 on a miniwhip at the end of his transmission. Location JO21it, I'm x-tal fixed on 502,3 so it was in way useless to call him transmitting on 503 providing he listens with a small filter. Jan/pa3abk Op 23-11-2010 22:04, John Rabson schreef: > Was he perhaps following coast station procedure and sending CQ _not_followed by K because he was not expecting a reply? > > Any ex ROs care to comment? > > John F5VLF > > On 23 Nov 2010, at 20:38CET, Rik Strobbe wrote: >