Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.13]) by air-mc02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC024-a8d64cd85fa819c; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:38:01 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1D69E3802C05B; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:13:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PFWB6-0005GT-9d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:10:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PFWB5-0005GK-Mu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:10:47 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PFWB3-0006ua-QI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:10:47 +0000 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA8I9uFT026802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:09:57 +0100 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA8IAikp014447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:10:44 +0100 Received: from [147.142.13.91] (vpn513-091.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.13.91]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oA8IA4P8031177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:10:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD83D22.50202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:10:42 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <798586.46009.qm@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <6EEAA299A2084FACB780B4F9A675C31C@JimPC> <304036.93066.qm@web111919.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <304036.93066.qm@web111919.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: BBB-4-like receiver ready for first tests Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000900070500050100030609" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d400d4cd83dab25e0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------000900070500050100030609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Daniele, Jim, LF, Am 08.11.2010 16:47, schrieb Daniele Tincani: > > Also consider that when I created a short circuit on the antenna input > of the rx (see Q2 in my e-mail), I got a response curve on SpecLab > similar to that I had with the Agilent, but with a peak level about > 30dB lower (about -107dB around f=2KHz on SpecLab). This means that your generated noise level was to low and you have observed the soundcards noise, at least outside the region of 2 kHz. So just look at 9 kHz without the generator and then increase the noise gernerator level so that the noise increases say 20 dB. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* James Moritz > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Mon, November 8, 2010 3:22:59 PM > *Subject:* LF: Re: BBB-4-like receiver ready for first tests > > > The filter rolls the gain off rapidly below about 1kHz and above about > 10kHz. So this would be OK for whistlers and 9kHz reception, but would > attenuate VLF utilities at higher frequencies. > Normally the MSKs are so strong that an attenuation of say 20 dB (compared to 9 kHz) will probably no problem. 20 dB gain reduction would not even mean 20 dB S/N reduction... What i would worry about is the high gain arround 2 kHz, where the mains hum is dominant, even if the frequency response (without an input signal) would be flat. Maybe this could become a problem if the levels get so high that the amp stages become nonlinear and/or the soundcard input. But just try what happend in reality!! In my experience it is a good indicator to see the diurnal noise levels having a minimum at arround 8...10 UTC. If the level difference is about 10...15 dB (depending on the WX of course) it is a good first step to assume a sensitive RX. The rest can be seen in tests where a far field signal is generated on the Dreamers Band ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------000900070500050100030609 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Daniele, Jim, LF,

Am 08.11.2010 16:47, schrieb Daniele Tincani:

Also consider that when I created a short circuit on the antenna input of the rx (see Q2 in my e-mail), I got a response curve on SpecLab similar to that I had with the Agilent, but with a peak level about 30dB lower (about -107dB around f=2KHz on SpecLab).
This means that your generated noise level was to low and you have observed the soundcards noise, at least outside the region of 2 kHz. So just look at 9 kHz without the generator and then increase the noise gernerator level so that the noise increases say 20 dB.

From: James Moritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Mon, November 8, 2010 3:22:59 PM
Subject: LF: Re: BBB-4-like receiver ready for first tests


The filter rolls the gain off rapidly below about 1kHz and above about 10kHz. So this would be OK for whistlers and 9kHz reception, but would attenuate VLF utilities at higher frequencies.

Normally the MSKs are so strong that an attenuation of say 20 dB (compared to 9 kHz) will probably no problem. 20 dB gain reduction would not even mean 20 dB S/N reduction...

What i would worry about is the high gain arround 2 kHz, where the mains hum is dominant, even if the frequency response (without an input signal) would be flat. Maybe this could become a problem if the levels get so high that the amp stages become nonlinear and/or the soundcard input.

But just try what happend in reality!! In my experience it is a good indicator to see the diurnal noise levels having a minimum at arround 8...10 UTC. If the level difference is about 10...15 dB (depending on the WX of course) it is a good first step to assume a sensitive RX. The rest can be seen in tests where a far field signal is generated on the Dreamers Band ;-)


73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------000900070500050100030609--