Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.29]) by air-ma08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA082-b5314cd489a518b; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:48:05 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B6126380000A4; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:48:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PEV3G-0003zH-SE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:46:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PEV3G-0003z8-GG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:46:30 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PEV3F-0005nS-QN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:46:30 +0000 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oA5MkSjj011563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:46:28 +0100 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA5MkSDC026321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:46:28 +0100 Received: from [147.142.8.28] (vpn508-028.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.8.28]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oA5MjqWu004255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:45:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD4895D.9040003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:46:53 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <201011051707030486.1EE50191@smtp2.numeo.fr> <1122369242.4418634.1288978178365.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb078> <4CD44860.80104@legal-medicine.de> In-Reply-To: <4CD44860.80104@legal-medicine.de> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411d4cd489a26c08 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Here also confirmed! And at about 13:20 UTC there must have been such a flair again? Signals came up again, suddenly! And... between 10 UTC and 20 UTC, the QRN rised > 15 dB. 73, Stefan Am 05.11.2010 19:09, schrieb pws: > Hi Horst, > > You wrote: > > >> ... >> I was very surprised to see and hear a signal on the SAQ frequency this afternoon. >> >> I think it really has been SAQ. You see a typical drift at the beginning of the carrier. Possibly they were servicing the transmitter. The signal was not as strong as while the official transmissions. >> ... >> > Confirming some weak traces at 17.2 kHz, 2010-11-05, 09:00-10:00 and > 13:25-15:00 utc. Unfortunately SAQ is near the "Nulls" of the antennas used > here. > > Gruesse aus Kiel, > Peter >