Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.11]) by air-dc10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC102-862e4cd02bc524b; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:18:29 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1D2EB3800185A; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:13:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PDIWo-0007tl-EL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:12:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PDIWo-0007tc-2t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:12:02 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PDIWn-0006Py-CC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:12:02 +0000 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA2FBKel030194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:11:21 +0100 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA2FC09T007775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:12:00 +0100 Received: from [147.142.13.24] (vpn513-024.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.13.24]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oA2FBMB1009571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:11:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD02A4A.6050002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:12:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20101101233708.02b5f67d@opc1> <007b01cb7a91$ceb8df60$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: The Wideband Noise Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600b4cd02aaf13a8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) An amateur allocation on 455 kHz would be funny! ;-) 73, Stefan Am 02.11.2010 15:06, schrieb Warren Ziegler: > Further to my previous post, The U.S. Government has taken a position > in favor of an amateur allocation at 461-469 kHz and 471-478 kHz. >