Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.133]) by air-mb07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB073-a7a34ccdc05c3c4; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:15:40 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F3525380000A5; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:15:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PCdLt-0004FH-Bs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:14:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PCdLs-0004F8-RO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:14:00 +0000 Received: from 113-mo2-8.acn.waw.pl ([62.121.95.113] helo=paranoid.lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PCdLq-0006f8-4w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:14:00 +0000 Received: from paranoid.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o9VJDumc001520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:13:56 +0100 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id o9VJDuWQ001517 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:13:56 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: paranoid.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:13:56 +0100 (CET) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4CCD4CB9.7030208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <4CCD3F0B.7040902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4CCD4CB9.7030208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.601 () BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: VLF: QRN Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="17435139-1916706836-1288552436=:710" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40854ccdc05a5890 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --17435139-1916706836-1288552436=:710 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Do you mean LF and VLF can be compared in that situation? I remember=20 > Scott/VE7TIL has reported that LF was totally down before some weeks but= he=20 > received the EU MSKs very well anyway. this was just an observation. lf and vlf are close enough, but i'm not a= =20 propagation expert > PS: Will your daughter be QRV on LF in CW some day? Please can i get a= sked?=20 > :-) maybe, she knows about 2/3 of the alphabet in cw already. ask me again in 12 years :) jacek --17435139-1916706836-1288552436=:710--