Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.137]) by air-dc09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC091-86054cc1ebf012d; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:54:24 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C5FD1380001AC; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:54:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9Nfh-0003VJ-1E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:53:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9Nfg-0003VA-L4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:53:00 +0100 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.151] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9Nfe-0003mE-2n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:53:00 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3518.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 039AE1C00085 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:52:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3518.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E3D871C00089 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.110.79.118]) by mwinf3518.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id AB9811C00085 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:52:51 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20101022195251702.AB9811C00085@mwinf3518.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:52:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101022-1, 22/10/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60894cc1ebed777c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none .... not a good idea , taken long enough as it is ! at least cannot blame Roger for a glitch in sub navigation ! -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > >> *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > >