Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.25]) by air-dc03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC034-86a14cc9bb4a3a8; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:04:58 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8197838000213; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PBWoZ-0002i5-Nk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:03:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PBWoZ-0002hw-8E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:03:03 +0100 Received: from col0-omc1-s9.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBWoX-0005vL-GY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:03:03 +0100 Received: from COL122-W51 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s9.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:02:53 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [81.200.63.88] From: Lubos OK2BVG To: _RSGB_LF Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:02:53 +0200 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2010 18:02:53.0568 (UTC) FILETIME=[579EB000:01CB76CA] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_e6847acf-950f-43cc-ab17-450d53ebe602_" Subject: LF: G3KEV_QSO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60194cc9bb473409 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --_e6847acf-950f-43cc-ab17-450d53ebe602_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Mal, LF!Thanks for our next cw QSO on 600m band and for your QSL as= well. As I can see, there is data transmittion on freqencies between 498= and 502kHz. As for me, I preferd using 501.888kHz, but it seems, that it= is not good idea to use this freqency now. I know, your favorite frequenc= y is 502.500kHz. What do you mean, would be a problem, when I will be usin= g 502.300kHz? I can=B4t disturbe you, but my signal is not so strong and= it wouldn=B4t be usable for UK stations on 501.888kHz. How serious pro= blem is the data station for UK hams?=20 Regards and 73!=20 Lubos, OK2BVG =3D --_e6847acf-950f-43cc-ab17-450d53ebe602_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Mal, LF!

Thanks for our next cw QSO on 600m band and for= your QSL as well. As I can see, there is data transmittion on freqencies= between 498 and 502kHz. As for me, I preferd using 501.888kHz, but it see= ms, that it is not good idea to use this freqency now. I know, your favori= te frequency is 502.500kHz. What do you mean, would be a problem, when I= will be using 502.300kHz? I can=B4t disturbe you, but my signal is not so= strong and it wouldn=B4t be usable for UK stations on= 501.888kHz. How serious problem is the data station for UK hams?

Regards and 73!

= Lubos, OK2BVG

=3D --_e6847acf-950f-43cc-ab17-450d53ebe602_--