Return-Path: Received: from mtain-da11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-da11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.83]) by air-de05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE051-5eb24cc2988ca2; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:10:52 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A07B038000085; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9ZAP-0006lu-2o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:09:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9ZAO-0006ll-NF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:09:28 +0100 Received: from smtp02.online.nl ([194.134.41.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9ZAM-0006lu-MD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:09:28 +0100 Received: from smtp02.online.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E35A2D7 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:09:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pa3fnytrqxpddu (s5593e077.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.147.224.119]) by smtp02.online.nl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:09:22 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:09:21 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: <008601cb7225$baf33ad0$4001a8c0@lark> Importance: Normal X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp02.online.nl) X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40534cc2988a50cd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none So you need permission to switch on a light??? 73 Victor -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Alan Melia Verzonden: vrijdag 22 oktober 2010 22:14 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They have powers over radiation at any frequency. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" To: Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > >