Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.10]) by air-mb08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB081-a7d34ccb162d12f; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:45:01 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7097E38000094; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PBtvH-00075Y-Hh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:43:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PBtvH-00075P-3J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:43:31 +0100 Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBtvE-0005G8-T1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:43:31 +0100 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so2728484bwz.16 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:43:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4THKd6rcbrQ+roRYHBwAla+CKT9/Jna3un8PyUwS90w=; b=cnwnDwF4+t4xVEQtN9ed3PaZPgHMb6hSE0AAyWokw++ksiWtWMk6LaaN6DTYDlISB0 G05ldXJDt9SRZfP5hue+D+S5IIbuV2/QKfjDdSlVluLxYM0r+mItYxSuCi8VHZ7P84Fw SUQcXx9xUlk9xuGTOJF2Q2pXFYuqjfP5blJbM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=usOiwi8ZjsC50tT63MCHB49tqCyS7KvZXvpM9AqQF52QXK6h54+KIUjtt9oIWtPlpb MpZHnIQppl+ctYxiW6fRc8Jan8Issx6XXKHAcjMVuWWJuvtgUDzvDpwXMpiOsKJiJSgn 0ffbLjc8hIyNXa6C9UfSt9bX+5EZ3CntphSN0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.120.195 with SMTP id e3mr3875337bkr.77.1288377807773; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.114.70 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:43:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CCAED49.6030007@o2.ie> References: <4CCAED49.6030007@o2.ie> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: Chris Gomoiu To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a404919fdd0493c5d526 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_EXPERIENCE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d308.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d400a4ccb162b7a22 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --001636c5a404919fdd0493c5d526 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Tony, No experience with the SDR-IQ but you can read more here: http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/dl.htm#SDR My setup is a Mercury SDR receiver, more info here: http://openhpsdr.org/mercury.html and I find it very good. Good luck with your decision. Chris 4X1RF On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Tony wrote: > Hello group. > > Has anyone any experience with this SDR ? > It looks interesting and I'm a bit tempted, especially as it works full > spec down to 500 Hz and "usable" to 100 Hz. > But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any good or > not. > > --001636c5a404919fdd0493c5d526 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Tony,

No experience with the SDR-IQ but you= can read more here:=A0 http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/dl.htm#SDR

My setup is a Mercury= SDR receiver, more info here: http://openhpsdr.org/mercury.html and I find it very good. Good luc= k with your decision.

Chris 4X1RF


On Fri, Oct 29, 2010= at 5:50 PM, Tony <ei8= jk@o2.ie> wrote:
Hello group.

Has anyone any experience with this SDR ?
It looks interesting and I'm a bit tempted, especially as it works ful= l spec down to 500 Hz and "usable" to 100 Hz.
But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any= good or not.


--001636c5a404919fdd0493c5d526--