Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.14]) by air-df08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF082-5eff4ca870b78b; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:01:59 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E96FC3800008E; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 08:01:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P2NF1-0005EW-1C for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:00:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P2NEq-0005EN-Jn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:00:20 +0100 Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P2NEp-00088v-LR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:00:22 +0100 Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so7404231iwn.16 for ; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:00:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G6bWXLbZ59K8nAH9b8IRY+Xc7ddPiczbwOLVWRbTOmM=; b=MAtrmgAfzPMBr42M1nlUpfBCZ5A71j+2BtG8gVtsvDlufZJD4Xqfo199rCGomxIGGL RHzgHN5I4aE9tlvz+6RPc2lbMdlDl17BtVfOCzwg97NJNyXGYH4NAsgHRI/JjYzJarMR TytOlc1g/7g9W2DE+pOckF2pZn6bL6FO89vco= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HwaDzdSdX263J61D+XIC+VsJKgmTn7xFL67SPdyrJS3w7YzW4jgn8rrCxW+Mmaxfrp czFAGMG4iW5tpLNZ3szU/Yx1zoz8nQqshCPgxopENWQmmZ/AQ/gh0TrmfKJlM+mghuFs OVoReMRDJkduVBwHKRmuabLTt7yG7Fmgw/GKw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.2.81 with SMTP id 17mr9171491icj.40.1286107216539; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.48.8 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 05:00:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <376446.30745.qm@web111903.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <4CA5E86D.1070208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <376446.30745.qm@web111903.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:00:16 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: looking for a simple-to-build sub-9KHz E-probe Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045016682c8eeb00491b52b0a X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=CELL_PHONE_BOOST, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m209.1 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4ca870b54047 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --005045016682c8eeb00491b52b0a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Use your existing or whatever loop, but before any preamp add a high pass filter. Take a look at http://www.g4jnt.com/LF_HPF.gif for a design using off the shelf component values for a 50 ohm design with Fc = 6kHz (to allow you to receive the 6900 kite signals, and provide > 80dB of rejection of 50Hz and its harmonics. If you want a another design - for a different Zo, Fc etc - have a play with AADE filter designer. It whiles-away a wet sunday afternoon (meanwhile checking there are no smoke signals) if nothing else :-) Andy www.g4jnt.com On 3 October 2010 12:31, Daniele Tincani wrote: > Hello VLF, > > just to try to improve a bit my reception at < 9KHz, I'm looking for a > easy-to-build E-probe design. > Currently I'm using a very simple system ( > http://www.vlf.it/easyloop/_easyloop.htm) which works very good but > unfortunately it has to succumb to the intense hum I have all around. In > fact, I live on the 5th floor of a 6-floors > jointly-owned building in a sub-urban area (in Livorno, Italy). I have a > motorway, a railway, electric powerlines, mobile phone antennas, etc. all > within a few hundreds meters. > I don't know if an E-probe would survive better than a loop in such an > hostile enviroment :-) However, a short whip is for sure easier to build and > to handle than a 70 cm x 70 cm, 40-turns loop like the one I have currently. > I'm also looking for an homebrew design as off-the-shelf receivers look to > me a bit costly compared to my VLF budget :-) > Any suggestions/references? > > Best regards > Daniele > > --005045016682c8eeb00491b52b0a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Use your existing or whatever loop, but before any preamp add a high= pass filter.
=A0
Take a look at=A0 http://= www.g4jnt.com/LF_HPF.gif=A0=A0=A0 for a design using off the shelf com= ponent values for a 50 ohm design with Fc =3D 6kHz (to allow you to receiv= e the 6900 kite signals, and provide > 80dB of rejection of 50Hz and it= s harmonics.
=A0
If you want a another design - for a different Zo, Fc etc=A0- =A0have= a play with AADE filter designer.=A0=A0 It whiles-away a wet sunday after= noon (meanwhile checking=A0there are no smoke signals)=A0if nothing else= :-)
=A0
On 3 October 2010 12:31, Daniele Tincani <danieletincan= i@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello VLF,
=A0
just to try to improve a bit my reception at < 9KHz, I'm looki= ng for a easy-to-build E-probe design.
Currently I'm using a very simple system (ht= tp://www.vlf.it/easyloop/_easyloop.htm) which works very good= but
unfortunately it has to succumb to the intense hum I have all around.=A0In= fact,=A0I live on the 5th floor of a 6-floors
jointly-owned building= in a sub-urban area (in Livorno, Italy). I have a motorway, a railway, el= ectric powerlines, mobile phone antennas, etc. all within a few hundreds= meters.
I don't know if an E-probe would survive better than a loop in su= ch an hostile enviroment :-) However, a short whip is for sure easier to= build and to handle than a 70 cm x 70 cm, 40-turns loop like the one I ha= ve currently.
I'm also looking for an homebrew design as off-the-shelf receiver= s look to me a bit costly compared to my VLF budget :-)
Any suggestions/references?
=A0
Best regards
Daniele


--005045016682c8eeb00491b52b0a--