Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.141]) by air-da09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA092-86194ccb1998a2; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:59:36 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3F79E380000A6; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:59:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PBu9T-0007R7-EU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:58:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PBu9T-0007Qy-1Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:58:11 +0100 Received: from mail-gy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBu9R-0005Q3-NG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:58:11 +0100 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2256430gyd.16 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:58:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2F+LCtxxL9Ku6Ts/txr9legvzT0uUzyMcGB0eikhpzM=; b=DS3dSJ49qHtoK3eiqWvuMhS+meUOPPqkCDvXvhkE0Wq5o58d7eCLsW/oWXQNNujtJy DaBzp4zBuAvUQJIqNN5ZmTP9uXbsi971np3eOJrh/Baag8lXuUlfl1EOoLyhCOTDzKPi 8VGv78GoKJi6vRdDorNz6mAFF4QMoehpp/rmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QzRZS1GkbwjaP0BemSE+mgGYZpD95TagbPdfJTyfQunwrpJ4HFa0JOVZATr/OZ8wGE tQd0jGZHsbgUGfeyve6bRxfc4PedrpkMsbNm8hwhu8kHAQrrVApCJP9C/+4hPLn/hRDv tV4KngpSBQulDiQ+iDoPTSH/8auoBrM+hhaKU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.243.70 with SMTP id ll6mr1818628icb.218.1288378682364; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.69 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:58:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CCAED49.6030007@o2.ie> References: <4CCAED49.6030007@o2.ie> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:58:02 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8702b2d2db0493c609a8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608d4ccb19950325 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --90e6ba6e8702b2d2db0493c609a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Lovely receiver. And just as useful as a piece of test equipment too - I use mine for phase noise measurements of crystal oscillators / PLLs when its not receiving LF - HF signals Only downside is that it only shows 190kHz spectrum in one go. Andy www.g4jnt.com On 29 October 2010 16:50, Tony wrote: > Hello group. > > Has anyone any experience with this SDR ? > It looks interesting and I'm a bit tempted, especially as it works full > spec down to 500 Hz and "usable" to 100 Hz. > But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any good or > not. > > --90e6ba6e8702b2d2db0493c609a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lovely receiver.=A0
=A0
And=A0just as useful as a piece of test equipment too - I use mine fo= r phase noise measurements of crystal oscillators=A0/ PLLs=A0when its not= receiving LF - HF=A0signals
=A0
Only downside is that it only shows 190kHz spectrum in one go.
=A0
On 29 October 2010 16:50, Tony <ei8jk@o2.ie> wrote:
Hello group.

Has anyone= any experience with this SDR ?
It looks interesting and I'm a bit= tempted, especially as it works full spec down to 500 Hz and "usable= " to 100 Hz.
But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any= good or not.


--90e6ba6e8702b2d2db0493c609a8--