DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=UfmidB5BLQ3oUaifCOSji0anYN0K9zfV4m0lrduP22dPCe3DQDjQ1493wtB2EfV+nx
         R+ZvobkaDkB1HgGQzOlEO+LW1qdUTGZWsdoBz+YzQnOBXrSVcMLEjKrsKft8uk9Fb5+9
         ViPD4UrLXq6oGebqTsaMc+UaBX31nndAXx9Qc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik0RJ_yoCWJ9CB=pSWSaneABFHn7291nwEkpAXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik0RJ_yoCWJ9CB=pSWSaneABFHn7291nwEkpAXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:16:16 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=qzHfxG+0-rzL2PRGOdUq9WB_SuP_VeQwA8tyh@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: 9kHz NoVs
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77d9be92c6c0492fc4934
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0016e6d77d9be92c6c0492fc4934
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes, we are expecting these to be issued within days.

The lady at the Met Office who has been checking what OFCOM finally proposed
is happy and thinks we will be too. She'd left me a voicemail when I got
back from South Africa today saying as much, but did not give me more
details.

Assuming there are no silly restrictions then I think OFCOM would be happy
for more NoVs to be issued, but may I suggest we see the wording before
rushing in with new applications for a week or so?  As soon the first NoVs
come through we'll share their contents here. Actually I'm pretty sure Rod
at OFCOM is being supportive and is genuinely interested in the serious work
now being done in Europe and elsewhere below 9kHz.

In the last 12 months sub-9kHz has gone from being a Dreamer's Band to a
part of the spectrum in which serious experimental work is being carried out
and OFCOM realise that this work is decent radio science worthy of support
and encouragement.

73s
Roger G3XBM



On 19 October 2010 17:50, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com> wrote:

> A little bird has told me that the issue with the Met Office re 9kHz
> operation in the Uk has been resolved, and Ofcom may be prepared to issue a
> limited number of NoVs for operation down there.   So it may be worth
> applying
>
> I was informed as I'd put in an application for this freq years ago.  But
> as most of the ideas I was interested in persuing have already been sorted
> by others,  probably won't bother going-ahead with mine now.   Too many
> projects in other parts of the spectrum
>
> Andy
> www.g4jnt.com
>



-- 
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088

--0016e6d77d9be92c6c0492fc4934
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, we are expecting these to be issued within days. <br><br>The lady at=
 the Met Office who has been checking what OFCOM finally proposed is happy=
 and thinks we will be too. She&#39;d left me a voicemail when I got back=
 from South Africa today saying as much, but did not give me more details.=
<br>
<br>Assuming there are no silly restrictions then I think OFCOM would be=
 happy for more NoVs to be issued, but may I suggest we see the wording be=
fore rushing in with new applications for a week or so?=A0 As soon the fir=
st NoVs come through we&#39;ll share their contents here. Actually I&#39;m=
 pretty sure Rod at OFCOM is being supportive and is genuinely interested=
 in the serious work now being done in Europe and elsewhere below 9kHz. <b=
r>
<br>In the last 12 months sub-9kHz has gone from being a Dreamer&#39;s Ban=
d to a part of the spectrum in which serious experimental work is being ca=
rried out and OFCOM realise that this work is decent radio science worthy=
 of support and encouragement.=A0 <br>
<br>73s<br>Roger G3XBM<br><br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 19 Oct=
ober 2010 17:50, Andy Talbot <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:andy.=
g4jnt@googlemail.com">andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><=
blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>A little bird has told me that the issue with the Met Office re 9kHz=
 operation in the Uk has been resolved, and Ofcom may be prepared to=A0iss=
ue a limited number of NoVs for operation down there.=A0=A0 So it may be=
 worth applying</div>


<div>=A0</div>
<div>I was informed as I&#39;d put in an=A0application for this freq years=
 ago.=A0=A0But as=A0most of the ideas I was interested in persuing have al=
ready been=A0sorted by others,=A0=A0probably won&#39;t bother going-ahead=
=A0with mine now.=A0=A0 Too many projects in other parts of the spectrum</=
div>


<div><br clear=3D"all">Andy<br><a href=3D"http://www.g4jnt.com" target=3D"=
_blank">www.g4jnt.com</a><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><a href=3D"http://g3xb=
m-qrp.blogspot.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/</a><=
br><a href=3D"http://www.g3xbm.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">http://www.g3xbm.c=
o.uk</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm" target=3D"_blank">http://www=
.youtube.com/user/g3xbm</a><br>G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678=A0=A0=A0 ISWL G11088<=
br>

--0016e6d77d9be92c6c0492fc4934--