Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.29]) by air-de08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE083-5ec04cb1dfcc17a; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:46:20 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 54AB6380000A7; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:46:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P4y4m-0000kS-A9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:44:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P4y4l-0000kJ-Oc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:44:39 +0100 Received: from web63605.mail.re1.yahoo.com ([69.147.97.75]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4y4j-0001GM-BM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:44:39 +0100 Received: (qmail 50756 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Oct 2010 15:44:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286725469; bh=78xBjzT/rFNCiGhN5LKkWohb6ZZgj3Y4U66IWGrO32w=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Theu12CjpsPXAJtFut3fg9TT/O2V2TQiERpxcdVP23rlFVcHkYg1/x1NTKZdEztOxd5bhClxb9C5gPKK+o2c+3PYPzvbDX8ztMEIDKGCjsOH7kJHq+P2lDWsRWcPgrAmEKL1f49ui5rcTRsClJciJjlCsZjvTsiIvS04F+bc/Zs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WO28Qf0hBxo/xytp5dfqs5dEO8B2uwSGN+WvaOUgi7bfnA8mVAbjv2Xk3hnQrKx7k31Ytcw7z529PVH0sWsB30cD3fLEtJgI370kZ8kETuMOZXOS5xu1mf0H7BBWXLqwDWUIBTMxf7t1buinhay97wwl+EBys3T/yOtnPMdGq3k=; Message-ID: <935140.49118.qm@web63605.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 5b2RTrsVM1kFl36hQJtqf.osPQU8qCMToZe6o_IzfHRh99r F.e6e4ytDGcpByQGcETs75cVOo3uAmR1L9Yr2BoYQUZQWiy8SlmYirLl1Tr2 JMM0idJzm6JziGXRU_4E3bMobTB9f3QJBSS9lBmRSLNjKM9kUXCFSiwO0r2z GKavfmCKTW.k13IU6mu_rEFPMwFzKPZE1GCM3YT6d2_OEUeEcl95UmcW5bnG MTyQEjHUZ6oppSPcs7eYB0gNDYNL4gWnLhAc- Received: from [98.70.116.87] by web63605.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:44:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.106.282862 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:44:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Andy - KU4XR To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Wireless link question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2076593801-1286725469=:49118" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m226.2 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411d4cb1dfcb157f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-2076593801-1286725469=:49118 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gary: =A0 I have not tried doing this using FM, but I have used a 100mWatt A.M. tran= smitter to send audio from a receiver in=A0the shack=A0to an A.M. radio in another= room.=A0=20 I connected the record out jack into the sound card input of the PC in the= family room, and,=A0It worked OK, and I was able to view QRSS in the family room= while=20 watching TV, instead of running back and forth between commercials to see= if I=20 was receiving anything. The only problem was the fact that there is not a= clear=20 A.M. frequency in the BC Band, and occasionally a station would come thru. In my opinion; a wireless FM transmitter would be better, and pose less interference problems from On Air stations. Probably a better Dynamic Rang= e for lower S/N ratio too. =A0 73 : =A0 =A0 Andy - KU4XR - EM75xr - Friendsville, TN. USA LOWfer Beacon " XR " @ 185.29875 KHz ( QRSS-60 ) *** Temporarily OFF, while constructing a new antenna *** Coordinates: N: 35=BA 43' 54" - W: 84=BA 3' 16" http://www.myspace.com/beaconxr *** The 5 most important words ever spoken *** http://ku4xr.webs.com/5mostimportantwords.htm --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Gary - G4WGT wrote: From: Gary - G4WGT Subject: LF: Wireless link question To: "LF Group (RSGB)" Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 11:14 AM Hi All, I wish to try a wireless link for an additional VLF/LF active antenna. Can= anyone advise me whether it will be best to use an FM or AM link. It will= be used for connection to a PC sound card. 73, Gary - G4WGT. --0-2076593801-1286725469=:49118 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gary:
 
I have not tried doing this using FM, but I have used a 100mWatt A.M.= transmitter
to send audio from a receiver in the shack to an A.M. radio= in another room. 
I connected the record out jack into the sound card input of the PC= in the family
room, and, It worked OK, and I was able to view QRSS in the fami= ly room while
watching TV, instead of running back and forth between commercials to= see if I
was receiving anything. The only problem was the fact that there is= not a clear
A.M. frequency in the BC Band, and occasionally a station would come= thru.
In my opinion; a wireless FM transmitter would be better, and pose le= ss
interference problems from On Air stations. Probably a better Dynamic= Range
for lower S/N ratio too.
 
73 :
 
 

Andy - KU4XR - EM75xr - Friendsville, TN. USA
LOWfer Beacon "= XR " @ 185.29875 KHz ( QRSS-60 )

*** Temporarily OFF, while constr= ucting a new antenna ***

Coordinates: N: 35=BA 43' 54" - W: 84=BA= 3' 16"
http://www.myspace.com/beaconxr

*** The 5 most important= words ever spoken ***

http://ku4xr.webs.com/5mostimportantwords.ht= m

--- On Sun, 10/10/10, Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk&= gt; wrote:

From: Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>=
Subject: LF: Wireless link question
To: "LF Group (RSGB)" <rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 11:14 AM
Hi All,

I wish to try a wireless link for an additional VLF/LF active antenna= . Can anyone advise me whether it will be best to use an FM or AM link. It= will be used for connection to a PC sound card.

73,

Gary - G4WGT.

--0-2076593801-1286725469=:49118--