Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi09.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.167]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB064-869a4cbec09c18c; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:12:44 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5C495380000D4; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P8VdZ-0000yT-CR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:11:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P8VdY-0000yK-Uw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:11:12 +0100 Received: from smtp823.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P8VdW-00030t-DG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:11:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 60519 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 10:11:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=H+dusBpWV5NAdq8C8HlNifXJfimNK0LIoSBMsgldB5XYalCjVvRFSBj9ighFvRhco5TxDc4ckSWAPONrxusEqTW0WabP5w44J6T5vH7bQ8RievWq+ZEPdTizaSNCIqaQYjm7RgUiq6Ouz7gNqzM4QP1IFmX/Vkpz89HEJebiNWI= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1287569464; bh=7Dj9YZi0C0Z1HEowIkGNsqUP7ynyM6UqRi5pOsixk5s=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=uxJGuIJ7xVFJam5jP/4yahE7EIGeJqYazTTioicUXaC18Fbg5cTgAKCCAlyyOSlX7USYy0wHUTz14NeDRGrWzPd5/Ay2rnTV8L3uTGI/Ll2tQOkyQuFC1bmPZga/ih3t4u9BbPWchZ5oVH4harBDVBI+RUPSbynUQkRjwUXJ5ac= Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (c.ashby435@86.169.134.120 with login) by smtp823.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 10:11:04 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: .u8e2g.swBByWKjbpA3lR6Fw.2ZEQrJJpVsTSrpXLCffsPaCEMY- X-YMail-OSG: ZtuABCMVM1mZYAeOYEs3rE9AtA00xDoYQYDEvW.MmuEMDET O2NXPU4Zty.Q6apFUgu3OdWFPx_4m.TVBpHVMBD8La3Nh7VA3nJHRHZc95eV 4RooaobB2gezezLg.XZt9rWAwv0nuJM5tVmnhL33VOArTI9AYy9C0vyCuCym 8ZtppphBjyqiBFnVegp3qAC5g294e399K6LxkcWn2XzhHcXRnlU8um44IYhg mzAedTMnkapDOEQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <7383C2F394D24A61A4D04AD2516EC590@IBM7FFA209F07C> From: "Chris" To: References: <367FDD82671449AEAB28C67EA989FE59@IBM7FFA209F07C> <001201cb7038$ddc18d80$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:11:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.36,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Variometer Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m275.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039400cded14cbec09b2de4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Alan, Yes, you're probably correct, but without knowing that 'detail' you coud easily misunderstand what it is suggested that unit could do. Incidentally, it was GW4ALG, not 3. Steve says one of the reasons he gave up on 136 was the 'first RSGB repeater on the band' and it attracting 'pirates'. I have never heard of an RSGB repeater on 136 and think it a most unlikely band to interest pirates. Maybe I'm wrong, I often am! Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:03 AM Subject: LF: Re: Variometer > Hi Chris that unit looks rather like the pictures of Steve GW3ALGs > variometer (others made similar units....the lego remote control rings > bells) which has featured in the LF Handbook and both editions of LF > Today. > If so Steve used a modifieed KW1000 linear I believe which was capable of > putting out quite a lot of power. Steve ran a 20m vertical with the top > 10m > supported by party ballooons when the wind was suitably low. If it was put > below his main fixed loading coil as an incremental inductor then it would > not have had to suffer such high voltages as at the main coil top. > > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris" > To: "RSGB LF Group" > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:31 AM > Subject: LF: Variometer > > > Hi LF, > Need a variometer? Take a look at Ebay item 120636022163. The claim is > this > item can cope with 'over a kW of RF' and covers 136kHz - I must say I have > my doubts! At least you can have a laugh at the 'amature' spelling and > terminology throughout!! > Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent. > >