Return-Path: Received: from mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.85]) by air-di02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI024-eabd4ccca39b36b; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:00:44 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7F2BD380000BB; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PCKOE-0000Zc-GA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:59:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PCKOD-0000ZT-VI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:59:09 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PCKOC-00049m-5v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:59:09 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9UMwaYh032049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:58:36 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9UMx640017495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:59:07 +0200 Received: from [129.206.196.165] (vpn165a.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.196.165]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9UMx7FS008837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:59:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4CCCA351.1070508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:59:29 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4CCC8022.90003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004e01cb7883$96949580$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <004e01cb7883$96949580$4001a8c0@lark> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id o9UMwaYh032049 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60554ccca39a4ef7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Alan, I want to try an alternative to the BF981 which runs in my current LF=20 grabber RX. It downconverts 137 kHz to 12 kHz and feeds the soundcard=20 with this 12 kHz signal. It is running not too bad but i have some=20 problems with temperature drifting bandpass filters (since weeks) and=20 have thrown them out of the Drain-to-Plus path. So, now the setup is=20 running with a 2 stage RC LPF. I have had some problems with a to high=20 125 kHz level on the soundcard input and have applied a series LC=20 circuit for 125 kHz now which reasonably solved the problem. But the LF=20 noise is now just about 10 dB above the soundcard noise, in the=20 afternoon. There is still a lack of sensitivity. This RX QTH should be=20 very well for a grabber antenna but currently the setup is the problem. So i want to try something different, like a DBM. I am not an expert=20 here and can/have to learn a lot, it seems ;-) 73, Stefan Am 31.10.2010 00:41, schrieb Alan Melia: > Hi Stefan why a difficult to get mixer?? the IF port on most DBMs is DC > coupled so feed the siganl in there and (i presume) mix up ?? Or is the > RF/LO response still too high on the easily available ones? > > Alan G3NYK > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 9:29 PM > Subject: LF: SBL-3+ > > > =20 >> Dear LF, >> >> I want to try a LF converter using this mixer. Does anybody know a >> (cheep!) distributor in Germany or EU for 1...3 pieces of it? I've just >> found one where it costs about 40 Euro and this is to much!! >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> =20 > =20