Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.12]) by air-di05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI053-eac84ccc41ef396; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:03:59 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 66F173800015B; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:03:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PCDsr-0005OJ-HN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:02:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PCDsr-0005OA-1m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:02:21 +0100 Received: from relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net ([217.69.40.75] helo=relay03.mail.uk1.eechost.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PCDso-0002DT-Vq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:02:21 +0100 Received: from [88.151.27.235] (helo=[192.168.1.107]) by relay03.mail.uk1.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1PCDsa-0004Hf-Ad for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:02:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4CCC417C.9070301@o2.ie> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:02:04 +0100 From: Tony User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4CCAED49.6030007@o2.ie> <4CCC2277.9040801@o2.ie> <045201cb7844$ca1df020$0201a8c0@Clemens04> In-Reply-To: <045201cb7844$ca1df020$0201a8c0@Clemens04> X-Auth-Info: 3810@permanet.ie (plain) X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600c4ccc41ed762a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Clemens. Sorry yes, it is the RF Space SDR-IQ that I am going to order. It was Graham, G8FZK that was asking about the $200 one. 73, Tony, EI8JK. On 30/10/2010 16:11, Clemens Paul wrote: > Tony, > > the most important difference between SDR-IQ/-IP(from RF Space) > or Perseus and the $200 SDR on > http://www.lazydogengineering.com/LD-1A_SDR.html > is that the latter is no direct sampling receiver. > It uses a downconverting technique with a number of shortcomings,e.g. > phase noise of the LO and others. > I would go for a direct sampling SDR like those e.g. from RF space or=20 > Perseus. > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 3:49 PM > Subject: Re: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ > > >> Thanks guys. >> >> You have just tipped the balance for me and I shall be placing an order >> for one on Monday morning. >> It's about time I joined the 21st century, but it will be interesting= to >> compare it to my beloved FT 102 rx. >> >> Tony, EI8JK. >> >> >> On 29/10/2010 16:50, Tony wrote: >>> Hello group. >>> >>> Has anyone any experience with this SDR ? >>> It looks interesting and I'm a bit tempted, especially as it works >>> full spec down to 500 Hz and "usable" to 100 Hz. >>> But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any good >>> or not. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------=20 > > > > > Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. > Von AVG =FCberpr=FCft - www.avg.de > Version: 9.0.864 / Virendatenbank: 271.1.1/3226 - Ausgabedatum:=20 > 10/29/10 20:34:00 > > > >