Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.208]) by air-df08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF083-5f004caa458112e; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:22:09 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C19FA380000BA; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:22:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P2sSZ-0001pz-KL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P2sSZ-0001pq-5m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:35 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P2sSX-0001H2-SR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:35 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o94LK0Z7029803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:20:00 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94LKWpc022411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:20:32 +0200 Received: from [147.142.13.77] (vpn513-077.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.13.77]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o94LK7qk030836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4CAA4521.6070301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:20:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4CA9BDE0.4000601@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <646839.20132.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <646839.20132.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: VLF: VLF at different locations and QRN as a function of daytime Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020003010909010201050606" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d04caa457f25ac X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------020003010909010201050606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Daniele, No problem about the callsign ;-) On VLF you don't even need one for transmitting, hi. Oh, you are in JN53EM, i haven't known that. The distance is 707 km! This is the 3rd best distance at all! Unbelivable, for a antenna in that location, very fine!!! I hope cou can improve your RX situation if this is your goal. And i hope i can transmit more meaningful messages the next time ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.10.2010 14:57, schrieb Daniele Tincani: > Hello Stefan, VLF, > frankly speaking, it is still unbelievable to me that I was able > to catch a faint trace of your signal and see it appearing on my PC. > This is because of the intense hum at my location and the > unsophisticated reception system that I use. Anyway, I'm glad to read > your opinion that the screenshot I captured was really showing your tx :-) > I'm also interested in supporting your idea of collecting information > about local QRN at different locations. I'm aways looking for > simple-to-build solutions for improving my setup. May be some helpful > information could emerge from this data analysis you are proposing. > For the time being, these are the information you have requested: the > locator is JN53EM. As for the callsign, I'm sorry, I haven't one. I'm > only "registered" as a SWL and my identifier is I0169LI > (http://www.qrz.com/db/I0169LI/). > Cheers > Daniele > > --------------020003010909010201050606 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Daniele,

No problem about the callsign ;-) On VLF you don't even need one for transmitting, hi.

Oh, you are in JN53EM, i haven't known that. The distance is 707 km! This is the 3rd best distance at all! Unbelivable, for a antenna in that location, very fine!!!

I hope cou can improve your RX situation if this is your goal.

And i hope i can transmit more meaningful messages the next time ;-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 04.10.2010 14:57, schrieb Daniele Tincani:
Hello Stefan, VLF,
 
frankly speaking, it is still unbelievable to me that I was able to catch a faint trace of your signal and see it appearing on my PC. This is because of the intense hum at my location and the unsophisticated reception system that I use. Anyway, I'm glad to read your opinion that the screenshot I captured was really showing your tx :-)
I'm also interested in supporting your idea of collecting information about local QRN at different locations. I'm aways looking for simple-to-build solutions for improving my setup. May be some helpful information could emerge from this data analysis you are proposing.
For the time being, these are the information you have requested: the locator is JN53EM. As for the callsign, I'm sorry, I haven't one. I'm only "registered" as a SWL and my identifier is I0169LI (http://www.qrz.com/db/I0169LI/).
 
Cheers
Daniele


--------------020003010909010201050606--