Message-ID: <4CA8FDB0.3010409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:03:28 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4CA5E86D.1070208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <489097268.20101002170449@mterrier.net> <4CA86C50.60807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <15910428710.20101003155303@mterrier.net>
In-Reply-To: <15910428710.20101003155303@mterrier.net>
Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 7th VLF kite experiment
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hello Michel,

Maybe i can try this at work. In some days i can tell you more. If=20
others want my audio record, this will be no problem too.

Tnx es 73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 03.10.2010 15:53, schrieb Michel Brunel:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> Do you know of a FTP site where I can upload the file ? Would be nice if=
 you
> could create a temporary login (for FTP) If not, don't bother with that,
> I'll try something else (at the expense of some delay)
>
> Noise was low yesterday, but can't tell about propagation or your RX set=
up.
> The challenge is, I believe, to get rid of all the man made noise and to=
 be
> able to dig the wanted signal deep into the noise. The latter requires=
 a high gain
> preamplifier with no intermod. This is why I put a high performance 11=
 kHz
> LPF before the 45 dB postamp.
>
> The SpectrumLab setup is basically the one avalable at Markus's site.
>
> Again Stefan thank you for a great saterday :)
>
> 73
>
> Michel - F5WK
>
>
> Le dimanche 3 octobre 2010 =E0 13:43:12, vous =E9criviez :
>
>   =20
>> Hello Michel,
>>     =20
>   =20
>> Your reception is very impressive. Can i get the 1 GB recording? ;-) An=
d
>> your SpecLab settings would be interesting too.
>>     =20
>   =20
>> I've seen, your SNR is just 10 dB less than on my own grabber in 40 km
>> distance. The question is if this is due to the local QRN or propagatio=
n
>> or a not optimal RX on my site ;-) But this means too, that it is reall=
y
>> worth receiving, if Markus/DF6NM is transmitting next time on his kite
>> antenna! The QRN is very low, today even much lower than yesterday!
>> I am looking forward to this season! :-)
>>     =20
>   =20
>> Maybe some xband QSOs (9/137) can be tried. QRSS-10 is no problem at
>> your QTH! All this is still a little unbelivable for me :-)
>>     =20
>   =20
>> 73, Stefan
>>     =20