DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=w7gArb8SU3KgQQPvG3CZCdQXsNs1ASUMRjBzpF1PLdO3b2Wz6R+Y3rcYj4XWDmt9hkZts6PTls1af3thT9ISU2myFaQ3YriXQycHHvUMu+8jDl5mcpgkmt5XYXOzWZXpJZP75oITIyyFcJ226CzAEi1wfSyAYgGm9lcvmIjCul0=;
Message-ID: <348012.99110.qm@web111912.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <4CA5E86D.1070208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <489097268.20101002170449@mterrier.net> <4CA86C50.60807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 05:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniele Tincani <danieletincani@yahoo.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <4CA86C50.60807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 7th VLF kite experiment
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1285281120-1286107365=:99110"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0-1285281120-1286107365=:99110
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Stefan, Michel, VLF,

I also noticed yesterday that the signal trace on Renato's grabber in Cumi=
ana=20
was clear but looked weaker than captures from more northern (sometimes fa=
rther)=20
stations.=A0One could say there was a preferential E-W=A0direction. May=20
be=A0propagation=A0matters?=A0In any case, it would interesting to know mo=
re about=20
Michel's setup.

Regards
Daniele



________________________________
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 1:43:12 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 7th VLF kite experiment

Hello Michel,

Your reception is very impressive. Can i get the 1 GB recording? ;-) And=
=20
your SpecLab settings would be interesting too.

I've seen, your SNR is just 10 dB less than on my own grabber in 40 km=20
distance. The question is if this is due to the local QRN or propagation=
=20
or a not optimal RX on my site ;-) But this means too, that it is really=
=20
worth receiving, if Markus/DF6NM is transmitting next time on his kite=20
antenna! The QRN is very low, today even much lower than yesterday!
I am looking forward to this season! :-)

Maybe some xband QSOs (9/137) can be tried. QRSS-10 is no problem at=20
your QTH! All this is still a little unbelivable for me :-)

73, Stefan



Am 02.10.2010 17:04, schrieb Michel Brunel:
> Hello Stefan LF/VLF group,
>
> Very nice copy in a quiet location in JN18IP. Distance is roughly 460 km=
.
> I have a full record, almost 1 Gb, of the input.
>
> Thank you Stefan.
>
> 73
>
> Michel - F5WK
>
>
>=A0 =A0=20


     =20

--0-1285281120-1286107365=:99110
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></h=
ead><body><div style=3D"font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size=
:10pt"><DIV>Hello Stefan, Michel, VLF,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I also noticed yesterday that the signal trace on Renato's grabber in=
 Cumiana was clear but looked weaker than captures from more northern (som=
etimes farther) stations.&nbsp;One could say there was a preferential E-W&=
nbsp;direction. May be&nbsp;propagation&nbsp;matters?&nbsp;In any case, it=
 would interesting to know more about Michel's setup.<BR></DIV>
<DIV>Regards</DIV>
<DIV>Daniele</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">=
<BR>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 13px">=
<FONT size=3D2 face=3DTahoma>
<HR SIZE=3D1>
<B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Stefan Sch=E4fer &lt=
;schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de&gt;<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold=
">To:</SPAN></B> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WE=
IGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Sun, October 3, 2010 1:43:12 PM<BR><B><SPAN=
 style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: VLF: DK7FC's 7th VLF=
 kite experiment<BR></FONT><BR>Hello Michel,<BR><BR>Your reception is very=
 impressive. Can i get the 1 GB recording? ;-) And <BR>your SpecLab settin=
gs would be interesting too.<BR><BR>I've seen, your SNR is just 10 dB less=
 than on my own grabber in 40 km <BR>distance. The question is if this is=
 due to the local QRN or propagation <BR>or a not optimal RX on my site ;-=
) But this means too, that it is really <BR>worth receiving, if Markus/DF6=
NM is transmitting next time on his kite <BR>antenna! The QRN is very low,=
 today even much lower than yesterday!<BR>I am looking forward to this sea=
son!
 :-)<BR><BR>Maybe some xband QSOs (9/137) can be tried. QRSS-10 is no prob=
lem at <BR>your QTH! All this is still a little unbelivable for me :-)<BR>=
<BR>73, Stefan<BR><BR><BR><BR>Am 02.10.2010 17:04, schrieb Michel Brunel:<=
BR>&gt; Hello Stefan LF/VLF group,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Very nice copy in a qui=
et location in JN18IP. Distance is roughly 460 km.<BR>&gt; I have a full=
 record, almost 1 Gb, of the input.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Thank you Stefan.<BR>&=
gt;<BR>&gt; 73<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; Michel - F5WK<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;&nbsp;=
 &nbsp; <BR><BR></DIV></DIV></div><br>

      </body></html>

--0-1285281120-1286107365=:99110--