Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.89]) by air-mf05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF054-8bec4cac353617a; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:37:10 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7055B38000093; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:37:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P3PTV-0003bV-It for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:35:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P3PTV-0003bM-5k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:35:45 +0100 Received: from mbox1.netikka.net ([213.250.81.202]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P3PTU-0005xI-IL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:35:45 +0100 Received: from hupu.netikka.net (hupu [172.16.83.91]) by mbox1-feedback.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817091277B0 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:35:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from imp1.netikka.net (imp1.netikka.net [213.250.85.154]) by hupu.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A870E4B0052 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:35:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imp1.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A140495BE2 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:35:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from proxy.wartsila.com (proxy.wartsila.com [194.251.142.28]) by imp.netikka.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:35:38 +0300 Message-ID: <1286354138.4cac34da55fcb@imp.netikka.net> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:35:38 +0300 From: Paul-Henrik To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20101005214122.35319e66@opc1> <20101006074015.0c0b34ab@opc1> In-Reply-To: <20101006074015.0c0b34ab@opc1> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 194.251.142.28 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40594cac3534215d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello John, Lee & co. The wideband noise was audible again last night in Vaasa, Finland for 20= to 30 minutes. I checked the time once and it was past 01.00 local time, so past 2200UTC. There was clearly QSB on the "signal" and it was moderate in stre= ngth while audble. I apologize for the somewhat inaccurate times but I only fol= lowed this while doing other things meanwhile. >From various comments on this signal here and on other lists I get the impression it is received continuously after dark in northwestern central Europe including G and EI. Does this suggest the above mentioned areas are within the first "hop" (<2= 000km) of the signal source but my location requires the signal to travel at leas= t two hops since "regular" nighttime propagation alone is not enough to bring th= e signal over here? I know there has been speculations regarding this with= very valid arguments already, just wanted to add my findings to the "list of evidence". BR Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ Quoting John P-G : > On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:38:51 +0100 > "Lee Hudson" wrote: > > > Hi John, Roelof, Graham, and all, > > > > Set up the grabber here so you can see the signal I refer. > > Thanks Lee. > > I could only watch the LF edge on my own grabber. I'll look at the HF > edge tonight perhaps. > > It appears that there's a wideish carrier at the LF side of the > noise-like modulated signal at approx 497.830kHz and a very clean > carrier inside the noise envelope at 498.500. There's no energy within > a few Hz of this 2nd carrier, which might suggest it is part of the > overall signal in some way? > > I see that these carriers fade up and down at the same times as the > wideband noise-like signal, which also suggests they are all part of > the same transmission? > > The signal wasn't too strong with me, and it's certainly not hindered > my reception in the 501.1 WSPR slot - I've received WD2XSH/17 quite > well over the last few days, and also /37 a couple of times too. > > If the mystery signal is strong enough tonight I'll try to DF it with > my Wellbrook loop, but can't promise anything. > > Cheers, > John > GM4SLV > > > > >