Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.148]) by air-mb07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB074-a7a84ccd59e926; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:58:33 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 95E1B3800009C; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PCWWn-0000xH-TS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:56:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PCWWn-0000x8-CP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:56:49 +0000 Received: from smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PCWWl-0004RS-S9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:56:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 65056 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2010 11:56:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=IrqE6o6+8zFmv+rwkLknRlJhOOl5Z59aKJtTU/vh7Hy2s2QE4XN064p6VCu8OpyHvZ7xAEUmybC2SolIS0RRnbwoK9E7xpyIjjEoQn57R99cyxiepHHzG6JNMSydan2lYIq2arsVZzWnd4Nbz0FBzJMShMJczi4X1zaMzxx9MHg= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1288526201; bh=B80ko17F9qKu2XWruuhHDB1mD0pW9GOYAZv8QIWB50Q=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=B2VI3U7JTTV8WDdnDTTkfukW8t/kgc35VrSzLC8gdr20M1dTVPmgq5deJ346PsReJhL/0CRpKEbXgBqRydfq6+gdNwC1uIt+jaQGGjUPbGZBBzqQHsGWK3IFlExyJm+ebRFhZWQtG6hQSXch/K6V1cwFX94/efgjkTnAXU4CCbc= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.143.100.219 with login) by smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2010 11:56:41 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: 5Re1ZOYVM1npf_h7yrfO7Ix8C1pOM.5vs63BR4kVd6HRhvj noUVPPiglc2PjcwArihA5GGPlMHpvbTvQwiESNrPTqxhn9k09lAFtKlqvQOs uq1I_sQDfo9HKjiL547Y8LdAPp32HqaYb9YTHEeyAdm7VgF5JLQgl8LeeOjX byfp86ad5kdlqrs8PsDMQOYNCYg6PTNyw_3bwa7QOcf6TToeMQMOh.uRbKRG Z1rWl851GCcTWFC6Mo_lC5TqtmWosAOEgZfXP091FrmyGOEa56TIJ_hpaV.H OkB_K8uFBnhHd5nwwqPCNZS6D1iPjoMcdOauDUeAhi74- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <004501cb78f2$b4d8ffd0$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4CCD3F0B.7040902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:56:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101031-0, 31/10/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: QRN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m228.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60944ccd59e66416 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jacek, interesting but there is no real cause for absorption at pre= sent, and it would not affect groundwave. However there was a flare this mor= ning at around 0400 0500z . This would have enhaced the skywave ay 225kHz= and perhaps lead to destructive interference with the groundwave?? Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Jacek Lipkowski" To: Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 10:26 AM Subject: Re: VLF: QRN On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > The QRN on the Dreamers Band is as low as never before since i am monitoring > the band. My DFCW-60 window is almost dark in the moment. [...] there seems to be increased absorption right now, maybe due to solar x-rays. i've just tried to show my daughter how a crystal radio works,= and can barely receive Warsaw 1 on 225kHz (with active antenna and tuned circut). normally i would receive several stations with just a diode= and low-impedance headphones. jacek