Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.5]) by air-di04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI043-eac44cc406912a6; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:12:33 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CD4FE3800009F; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:12:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9xXE-00087m-9E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:10:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9xXD-00087d-G2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:10:39 +0100 Received: from out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9xXB-0004AP-OP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:10:39 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao0FAGKiw0xcEY5u/2dsb2JhbACHZJoAcblOghiDMASNaQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,231,1286146800"; d="scan'208";a="465584563" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.17.142.110]) by out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 24 Oct 2010 11:10:30 +0100 Message-ID: <003001cb7363$ab0ccb10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:10:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40054cc4068f2d49 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Victor I am on the East coast and just across the sea from Holland and most Dutch stns are audible with me on 137 and 500. The stn on 9 Kcs was on slow hand sent cw and is most likely to be PA but qsb was bad and then it stopped before I got any ID. Listen out just below 9 Kcs. My antenna is 3 x inv L up 100 ft vertical and over 400 ft horz all in parallel and resonated around 9 Kcs, each one 500 ft in total length (1500 ft total wire, 457 metres). RX is a selective voltmeter/audio to computer spectrum display mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 10:35 AM Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > Hello Mal, > > how are you so sure it's a PA0 station,any id? The radio spectrum is > regulated from 9 KHz to (if I am correct) 300GHz.Maby some governments want > to regulate outside these borders...Of course (lucky) the radiowaves don't > stop at the English coast.I don't think most governments have very much > interrest > regulating below 9KHz,practical applicatians are rare and it's very > difficult to radiate a signal at all,let alone intefere with some other > service. > If their is a dutch station active I would like to know who it is and listen > for him,or here! > > 73 > Victor > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens mal hamilton > Verzonden: zondag 24 oktober 2010 11:06 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > Victor > I have already heard a PA0 stn on 9 Kcs a couple of weeks ago, weak signal > on slow CW and last nite when I got into the shack in the evening there was > a stn testing carrier on/off for short periods, could be the same stn back > agn. > It seems strange in the UK a licence is needed for the audio spectrum > whereas those EU countries a few miles away across the channel have a free > hand. > Maybe they think these radio waves stop at the English coast. > The same thing happened some years back when CB was prohibited in the UK > whereas it was permitted in most parts of EU. Its hard to work out the > logic. > The new UK government are de restricting many of the past regulations and > maybe will look at Ofcom procedures although in EU there are also > restrictive practices like no permits for 500 Kcs in most countries. > > de g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 9:07 AM > Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > Hello Alan, > > > > So under british regulations I did a lot of illegal experiments in the > past > > HI.I don't know how the dutch telecom office thinks about this but I have > a > > feeling they just don't want to be bothered with this kind of > experiments.If > > I had the room for decent antenna's I was already transmitting at 9 KHz! > > > > 73 > > > > Victor > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Alan Melia > > Verzonden: zaterdag 23 oktober 2010 23:33 > > Aan: RSGB LF Gp > > Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > > > In theory, if you communicate, yes! They reserve the right to make the > > decision to approve, and laser comms are under their "regulation" > > > > Alan > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 9:09 AM > > Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > > > > So you need permission to switch on a light??? > > > > > > 73 > > > > > > Victor > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Alan Melia > > > Verzonden: vrijdag 22 oktober 2010 22:14 > > > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > > Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > > > > > > No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They > > have > > > powers over radiation at any frequency. > > > Alan G3NYK > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Jacek Lipkowski" > > > To: > > > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > > > > > > > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > > > > > > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for > 8.0-8.990kHz > > > > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a > > trick > > > > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > > > > > > > VY 73 > > > > > > > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >