Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.19]) by air-dc08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC081-86044c9b93f339a; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:52:51 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1822C38000118; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Oypx0-0005Q8-Bf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:51:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Oypwq-0005Pz-1U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:51:08 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.33]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oypwo-0005s7-S1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:51:09 +0100 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8NHp0GE038663 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:51:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01cb5a7a$44cfcc50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4C1A271605FB0B62@smtp208.alice.it> <4C9A8CC5.30305@gmx.com> <4C9B3FCE.5080700@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:50:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4C9B3FCE.5080700@gmx.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: LF: PA0RDT miniwhip in TX? Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60134c9b93f16956 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello Mike, > My antenna was mounted 15' off the ground with a ground wire connected > to the coax braid right under the antenna. That is interesting. This might imply that the ground at the antenna is at the voltage level induced in the 15' long wire to ground. This might lead to a number of unforeseen effects. So, I wonder if the FET was damaged due to induced voltage on the PCB antenna or due to the voltage over the wire to ground. I have mounted the antenna at about the same height, but the shield of the feedline is connected to a ground stake at the bottom of the mast. I use a BNC panel mount feedthrough like this one: http://rocky.digikey.com/weblib/Emerson/Johnson/Web%20Photos/CP-AD-556M.jpg It is mounted on a small piece of aluminium sheet, which is connected with a short wire to the ground stake. The feedline is broken up at the bottom of the mast and two BNC connectors have been fitted. Though real heavy thunderstorms are rare in this part of the country, I have had strikes within 300 m with no ill effects on the antenna. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt