Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi02.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.155]) by air-df02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF024-5ee94c8ab8e72cc; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:01:59 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5AEDA380000A0; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:01:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ou69f-0003bV-HU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:08:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ou69V-0003bD-4x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:08:37 +0100 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.151] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou69T-000465-2w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:08:37 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3504.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4BA93700043D for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3504.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3EF7E7000462 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.110.89.225]) by mwinf3504.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id ED49C700043D for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:08:28 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20100910160828972.ED49C700043D@mwinf3504.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <000a01cb50bc$73df5140$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <4C8A4F1C.5000302@telus.net> <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:08:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100910-0, 10/09/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: QRS600 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0126_01CB510A.C98C2980" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400cdeca4c8ab8e63557 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_0126_01CB510A.C98C2980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2 KW all day long ......... and here's me with 25 watts to 35 ft= of wire with a coke bottle on the end decoding over 650K in day= light .. no need to even switch the fan on ..same band , different= planet ! G From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:57 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: QRS600 Thats a mighty big TX but will the atu/caps and antenna wire stand it= especially on 9 K/cs g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Scott Tilley=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:30 PM Subject: Re: LF: QRS600 My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed key down. This= isn't really a problem with good thermal engineering. Scott VE7TIL On 9/10/2010 7:47 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20 How many transmitters could stand this duty cycle, especially the= QRO versions. The time needed to send a full callsign for ID could we= ll burn the TX out. Those using QRS 120 in the past for prolonged periods reported pro= blems. g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0126_01CB510A.C98C2980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2 KW all  day  long ..= .......=20  and here's me with  25 watts to 35 ft of wire  = with a=20 coke  bottle on the  end   decoding over 650K in day li= ght .. no=20 need  to even  switch the  fan on ..same band , different planet  !
 
G
 
 

Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600

Thats a mighty big TX but will the at= u/caps and=20 antenna wire stand it especially on 9 K/cs
 
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Sco= tt Tilley=20
Sent: Friday, September 10,= 2010 4:30=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600

My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed= key down.=20 This isn't really a problem with good thermal=20 engineering.

 Scott
VE7TIL

On 9/10/2010 7:47= AM, mal=20 hamilton wrote:=20
How many transmitters could stand= this duty=20 cycle, especially the QRO versions. The time needed to send a full= callsign=20 for ID could well burn the TX out.
Those using QRS 120 in the past= for prolonged=20 periods reported problems.
g3kev
 


------=_NextPart_000_0126_01CB510A.C98C2980--