Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.133]) by air-mf01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF013-8bcb4c82b311184; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:58:57 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AACC338000086; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:58:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OrzoG-0003d7-JO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:58:00 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OrzoG-0003cy-6k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:58:00 +0100 Received: from imr-ma03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OrzoB-0007IM-1w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:58:00 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.131]) by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o84Kvmd6007340 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:57:48 -0400 Received: from Black (nrbg-4d072d1e.pool.mediaWays.net [77.7.45.30]) by mtaout-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 14F78E0000C6 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <8CD18D871990A26-1370-24FA@Webmail-d118.sysops.aol.com> <4C7FE4DD.7040005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4C7FE4DD.7040005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:57:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16669 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com id o84Kvmd6007340 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Loop above ground Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40854c82b30f353c X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Stefan, LF, this is a simple question but not easy to answer. I think it depends= on=20 whereabouts you want to look. Unlike electric fields, magnetic fields easily penetrates the ground= down to a=20 skin depth, which can be some tens of meters depending on frequency an= d soil=20 conductivity. So in the immediate vicinity of a small loop antenna, th= e effect=20 of real ground on the field is hardly noticable. Even if you buried it= a couple=20 of meters, the loop would still radiate (albeit with some extra loss= =20 resistance). On the other hand, looking at the farfield, the skin layer will indeed= act as a=20 reflector. This results from the fact that the surface currents have= to cancel=20 the loop field deep in the ground. As long as the skindepth is much le= ss than a=20 vacuum wavelength, this shielding current contributes just as much to= the far=20 field as a metal ground plane would do. Thus the radiation resistance,= which=20 describes the power transfered to the far field, has to include an ima= ge loop,=20 and it is doubled to Rrad =3D 62.3 kohm * area^2 / lambda^4. So much for my five cent's worth... I wonder if there are is experimen= tal=20 evidence of this factor of two, eg. by direct measurement of radiated= field=20 strength around a transmit loop antenna. Best 73, MArkus (DF6NM) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7:54 PM Subject: Re: LF: ERP calculation (revised) Hello Markus, Roger, LF, Am 02.09.2010 19:07, schrieb Markus Vester: >>Note this is using the radiation resistance for a loop in free space= , as the=20 >>effect of ground is already included in the earth antenna picture.= For an=20 >>above-ground loop with a mirror image beneath it, radiation resistan= ce would=20 >>be doubled.<< Can the ground/soil be seen as a mirror for LF? It depends on the cond= uctance=20 and Epsilon R of course, but i mean the "normal" conds ;-) 73, cu, Stefan