Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.27]) by air-de08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE084-5ec14c93c36a10c; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:14 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8965D380000C2; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Owgj5-0005In-Ii for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:36:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Owgiv-0005Ia-5v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:35:53 +0100 Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Owgit-0004oV-HU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:35:54 +0100 Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so2668862iwn.16 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:35:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dmy6m/8raNWBr1Lvmfj9rUcNu+xzgd/+zKM4zdGSHTM=; b=knrNnlpbi2EGARFLPv17bLExA1nu66N2wL5vS33+xrO5N3CsxGAnD9e86MDQWjETcf KdjHeD6DTe7F71izrnLxW7jfO0+nHLTKySidkpAh7IEeRzpZCeVpThV3BruWeHtdoFwH DTIn77jW65iRRR7Ly5D1BrYJo1i3rPlMjqO8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JqSHYS2VphGBVmQj5GL1kLkIls9QjEPamk8HYXRcFENwhZdsZCJO3D4Is4Frmsmq06 bfVxV9L0UG8tm+9Ifi83iY3P+vMvt60EzT1JFSIg91s2uXlVyjwUqBQFergUR0USqble UyjBUPOrMyatnJb/gx1va0zbBmfOP9HzT7zLs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.146.212 with SMTP id i20mr5718221ibv.52.1284752150213; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.145.145 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:35:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:35:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: G4JNT 503kHz Beacon Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6469b0c89b57f049079ab56 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: S X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d232.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601b4c93c369687a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e6469b0c89b57f049079ab56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No,can't have both - only one antenna here :-( Andy www.g4jnt.com On 17 September 2010 20:31, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > I'd appreciate a 137kHz WSPR beacon Andy. 500kHz too if both possible. > > 73s > Roger > > On 17 September 2010 19:27, Andy Talbot wrote: > >> Is there likely to be much interest in my 503kHz beacon or is it worth >> looking at replacing it with a 137kHz WSPR one? Its been mostly off air >> for a couple of weeks while the antenna was rebuilt as a dual purpose fat HF >> dipole / top loaded Tee - and I still haven't got round to optimising the >> pre-matching for the HF bit yet. >> >> However, it does now resonate at 503 and 137kHz and its tempting to put a >> low duty cycle WSPR signal on over the winter period using the 700 Watt >> switchmode PA which has been sitting idle for a few years now. However, a >> new lower power beacon Tx may be more acceptable - especially to my >> electricity bill. >> >> Andy >> www.g4jnt.com >> > > > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 > --0016e6469b0c89b57f049079ab56 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No,can't have both - only one antenna here :-(
=A0
On 17 September 2010 20:31, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn= @gmail.com> wrote:
I'd appreciate a 137kHz WS= PR beacon Andy.=A0 500kHz too if both possible.

73s
Roger
On 17 September 2010 19:27, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com> wrote:
Is there likely to be much interest in my 503kHz beacon or is it wort= h looking at replacing it with a 137kHz WSPR one?=A0=A0=A0 Its been mostly= off air for a couple of weeks while the antenna was rebuilt as a dual pur= pose fat HF dipole / top loaded Tee - and I still haven't got round to= optimising the pre-matching=A0for the HF bit yet.
=A0
However, it does now=A0resonate =A0at 503 and 137kHz and its tempting= to put a low duty cycle WSPR signal=A0on over the winter period=A0using= the 700 Watt switchmode PA which has been sitting idle for a few years no= w.=A0 However,=A0 a new lower power=A0beacon Tx=A0may be more acceptable= - especially to my electricity bill.



--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.= uk
= http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678=A0=A0=A0 IS= WL G11088

--0016e6469b0c89b57f049079ab56--